Author Topic: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty  (Read 111141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hamish Seggie

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 215,812
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,928
  • This is my son Michael, KIA Afghanistan 3 Sep 08
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #575 on: May 15, 2018, 19:37:26 »
It's also about Irving's perspective that they're the only company that can, and should build ships in Canada.

Sounds like “we’re entitled to our entitlements” crew.
Freedom Isn't Free   "Never Shall I Fail My Brothers"

“Do everything that is necessary and nothing that is not".

Offline 211RadOp

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 22,178
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 808
  • Now is the tyme....damn missed again....Now is the
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #576 on: June 28, 2018, 10:16:01 »
The latest in the story.  According to the article and CANFORGENs, he will be put into a supernumerary position within the CDS's org.

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2018/06/27/suspended-vice-admiral-mark-norman-to-be-removed-as-militarys-second-in-command.html
“Behind every great man is a woman rolling her eyes." Jim Carrey
"Do unto others, then run." Benny Hill
"There's no better feeling in the world than a warm pizza box on your lap." Kevin James

Offline Blackadder1916

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 160,000
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,807
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #577 on: September 04, 2018, 19:06:00 »
Admiral Norman finally has a court date.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/norman-military-corruption-court-1.4807987
Quote
Mark Norman's military corruption trial will play out during the 2019 election campaign
Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: Sep 03, 2018 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: 6 hours ago

It will be next summer before Vice-Admiral Mark Norman goes to trial on a single charge of breach of trust — putting a politically-charged corruption case right in the middle of the next federal election campaign.

A trial date of Aug. 19, 2019 was set as the military's former second-on-command elected Tuesday to be tried in provincial court, a hearing that is expected to take seven weeks.

His lawyer, Marie Henein, denied she wanted the case heard during a politically sensitive time and said the long run-up is needed because of a fight with the government over disclosure of documents.

She said she has asked the Crown to waive cabinet secrecy on all documents related to the case — a request to which the government has not responded.

"It's quite an extraordinary prosecution where, really, the complainants decide what we get to look at, what's important and what's not," she said following Tuesday's court appearance.

"We've asked for a full waiver of cabinet confidence so that we can defend this case, so that we can see the full story, and that waiver is still not forthcoming."

Henein also served notice in court Tuesday that she will be bring forward a motion early next year to have the charges against Norman stayed.

The clock is ticking. The Supreme Court of Canada's landmark Jordan decision requires that an accused face trial in a provincial court within 18 months of being charged.

The judge hearing the Norman case on Tuesday asked Henein if she would be flexible about the deadline. Henein said she was not prepared to waive anything as long as issues of disclosure by the Crown remain in play.

Norman was charged last spring after the RCMP accused him of leaking cabinet secrets to a Quebec shipyard in relation to a contract to lease a supply ship to the navy.

The charges relate to his time as commander of the navy. He was, at the time of being charged, the vice chief of the defence staff.

Norman was removed from the post this summer, but remains suspended with pay. His job is now being filled by the former commander of the Canadian Army, Lt.-Gen. Paul Wynnyk.

On Tuesday, Norman thanked his supporters, some of whom sat through the court proceedings.

"This has been a really difficult time and it's going to continue to be a real challenge and I just want everybody to know how much that support means to me," he said.

A Go-Fund-Me page has been set up to defray his legal costs, which the federal government has refused to pay. It has a set goal of $200,000, of which $140,450 had been raised by Tuesday.
Whisky for the gentlemen that like it. And for the gentlemen that don't like it - Whisky.

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 166,050
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,107
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #578 on: September 04, 2018, 21:52:13 »
Admiral Norman finally has a court date.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/norman-military-corruption-court-1.4807987

Based on an August 19th trial start, with seven weeks scheduled for trial, it's very possible that there will not yet be a verdict by the election. It doesn't specify if this will be a jury or a judge only trial, though I wouldn't be surprised to see this go jury for strategic reasons.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline PuckChaser

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 910,795
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,957
    • Peacekeeper's Homepage
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #579 on: September 04, 2018, 22:15:49 »
All the dirty details will get out though, without the pesky facts of a verdict. I think politically, the Liberals are going to feel karma from the Mike Duffy debacle.

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 166,050
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,107
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #580 on: September 04, 2018, 22:22:52 »
I'm betting crown pushes for a publication ban.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline sidemount

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 6,090
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 415
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #581 on: September 04, 2018, 22:26:36 »
I think there is also the possibility of the charges being dropped so that the liberals dont have to disclose their dirty secrets.

One can hope anyway.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership. - Colin Powell

Offline Colin P

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 125,110
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,829
  • Civilian
    • http://www.pacific.ccg-gcc.gc.ca
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #582 on: September 04, 2018, 22:43:56 »
That would suck, dropping charges leaves a taint, whereas being exonerated in the court room means he can don his uniform and go back to work. If they drop charges, I hope he can find reasons to sue for defamation of character .

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 166,050
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,107
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #583 on: September 05, 2018, 07:47:31 »
That would suck, dropping charges leaves a taint, whereas being exonerated in the court room means he can don his uniform and go back to work. If they drop charges, I hope he can find reasons to sue for defamation of character .

Either way his security clearance is probably toast. The threshold for revoking clearance for leaking information is considerably lower than the threshold for criminal conviction. I guess it will hinge on whether the trial focuses on 'did he leak the documents?' or 'did him leaking these documents constitute a criminal offense of breach of trust?'.

I could be wrong of course, but from the outside looking in that seems like a significant factor.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline Oldgateboatdriver

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 131,210
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,455
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #584 on: September 05, 2018, 08:28:35 »
Based on an August 19th trial start, with seven weeks scheduled for trial, it's very possible that there will not yet be a verdict by the election. It doesn't specify if this will be a jury or a judge only trial, though I wouldn't be surprised to see this go jury for strategic reasons.

I could be wrong as I have not looked at these type of things for a while, but the news state that the trial is scheduled in the Provincial court of Ontario, not the Ontario Supreme court. Jury trials are held in the Supreme court, normally - not in the Provincial one - where trials before a judge alone are usually held. So this would be a trial before a judge only ... but also a trial before judge appointed to the bench by the Ontario provincial government instead of a judge holding appointment from the Federal government.

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 166,050
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,107
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #585 on: September 05, 2018, 08:39:47 »
I could be wrong as I have not looked at these type of things for a while, but the news state that the trial is scheduled in the Provincial court of Ontario, not the Ontario Supreme court. Jury trials are held in the Supreme court, normally - not in the Provincial one - where trials before a judge alone are usually held. So this would be a trial before a judge only ... but also a trial before judge appointed to the bench by the Ontario provincial government instead of a judge holding appointment from the Federal government.

I believe you're right, I didn't think of it from that angle. That would seem to increase the likelihood that the judge will ponder for some time before delivering a verdict. This case will, after all, be precedent setting and would have a high likelihood of appeal one way or another.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline Blackadder1916

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 160,000
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,807
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #586 on: September 05, 2018, 10:32:08 »
. . . whereas being exonerated in the court room means he can don his uniform and go back to work. . . .

You may be overly optimistic.  While being found "not guilty" in a court will remove him from jeopardy, he will never be "exonerated" in the eyes of this current government and at his rank level any job that he could do in uniform will be solely at the pleasure of the political masters.  He may be more welcome if a different party came to power - in fact such an appointment would be a visible "feck you" but such is the pettiness of politicians of any stripe.  I suspect that his naval career is at an end; he may given some government service role in the future but, given his age, that may not be in uniform.  The many months since he was removed from duty and the next year until completion of the legal process will give him ample time to prepare for the next chapter of his life.  It would not surprise me to see a book by him on the shelves shortly after the end of his trial.  He has many worthwhile things to say publicly.  He may end up being the Landymore for his generation of sailors.
Whisky for the gentlemen that like it. And for the gentlemen that don't like it - Whisky.

Offline Halifax Tar

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 43,978
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,765
  • Ready Aye Ready
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #587 on: September 05, 2018, 10:46:01 »
You may be overly optimistic.  While being found "not guilty" in a court will remove him from jeopardy, he will never be "exonerated" in the eyes of this current government and at his rank level any job that he could do in uniform will be solely at the pleasure of the political masters.  He may be more welcome if a different party came to power - in fact such an appointment would be a visible "feck you" but such is the pettiness of politicians of any stripe.  I suspect that his naval career is at an end; he may given some government service role in the future but, given his age, that may not be in uniform.  The many months since he was removed from duty and the next year until completion of the legal process will give him ample time to prepare for the next chapter of his life.  It would not surprise me to see a book by him on the shelves shortly after the end of his trial.  He has many worthwhile things to say publicly.  He may end up being the Landymore for his generation of sailors.

I like your reference.  And I think you may be on to something.
Lead me, follow me or get the hell out of my way

Offline Bzzliteyr

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 52,880
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,069
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #588 on: September 05, 2018, 16:16:09 »
You may be overly optimistic.  While being found "not guilty" in a court will remove him from jeopardy, he will never be "exonerated" in the eyes of this current government and at his rank level any job that he could do in uniform will be solely at the pleasure of the political masters.  He may be more welcome if a different party came to power - in fact such an appointment would be a visible "feck you" but such is the pettiness of politicians of any stripe.  I suspect that his naval career is at an end; he may given some government service role in the future but, given his age, that may not be in uniform.  The many months since he was removed from duty and the next year until completion of the legal process will give him ample time to prepare for the next chapter of his life.  It would not surprise me to see a book by him on the shelves shortly after the end of his trial.  He has many worthwhile things to say publicly.  He may end up being the Landymore for his generation of sailors.

I wonder, does he have to remain FORCE test current?
Adsum

UNPROFOR, CPSM, Canadian Forces Commander Land Force Command Commendation (Bosnia 1993), Canadian Decoration, General Campaign Star - ISAF

Offline Ostrozac

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 30,000
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 697
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #589 on: September 05, 2018, 19:09:16 »
I wonder, does he have to remain FORCE test current?

In Ottawa, you usually book a FORCE test by DWAN; the member in question no longer has DWAN access (his blackberry is currently in an evidence locker and he has been 'invited' not to physically come to work), besides, his old office is in use by the current VCDS.

I do suspect that he is still a member of the Navy Officer's Mess, as NPF will still want their pound of flesh. It might be the only CF/DND-associated building that he can't be ordered away from, because ordering someone away to stay away from their mess simply isn't done.

Offline boot12

  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • 10,015
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 91
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #590 on: September 05, 2018, 19:59:39 »
I wonder, does he have to remain FORCE test current?

Given that he's essentially removed from all of the day-to-day aspects of his military career, I have to assume that he's expired.  That being said, who's going to put him on remedial measures for it?  Anyone with the power to do so is surely clever enough to see how that would play out once it inevitably made it to the press.

Offline Hamish Seggie

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 215,812
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,928
  • This is my son Michael, KIA Afghanistan 3 Sep 08
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #591 on: September 06, 2018, 07:56:56 »
This should be interesting. Methinks the PM et al may be guilty of trying to rig the process.
Freedom Isn't Free   "Never Shall I Fail My Brothers"

“Do everything that is necessary and nothing that is not".

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 89,350
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,927
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #592 on: September 06, 2018, 10:57:12 »
This should be interesting. Methinks the PM et al may be guilty of trying to rig the process.

As we've seen with things like sexual harassment, the rules don't apply to Justin trudeau.
Optio

Offline sidemount

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 6,090
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 415
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #593 on: September 06, 2018, 15:47:42 »
The rules never seem to apply to those making them

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership. - Colin Powell

Offline Retired AF Guy

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 34,880
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,541
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #594 on: September 06, 2018, 18:48:54 »
The rules never seem to apply to those making them

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Its being like that for millennium.
Years ago, fairy tales all began with, "Once upon a time." Now we know they all began with, "If I'm elected."

Carolyn Warner

Offline sidemount

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 6,090
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 415
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #595 on: September 06, 2018, 18:50:35 »
And will never change

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership. - Colin Powell

Offline X Royal

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 19,400
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 575
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #596 on: September 09, 2018, 22:25:47 »
I could be wrong as I have not looked at these type of things for a while, but the news state that the trial is scheduled in the Provincial court of Ontario, not the Ontario Supreme court. Jury trials are held in the Supreme court, normally - not in the Provincial one - where trials before a judge alone are usually held. So this would be a trial before a judge only ... but also a trial before judge appointed to the bench by the Ontario provincial government instead of a judge holding appointment from the Federal government.
Sure you don't mean the Ontario Superior Court of Justice instead of the Ontario Supreme Court.
Two completely different courts.
I'm soon to report for jury duty and it's not for the Supreme Court but for the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2018, 22:29:14 by X Royal »

Offline Privateer

    Looking for the bubble.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Full Member
  • *
  • 18,800
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 349
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #597 on: September 10, 2018, 00:36:54 »
Ontario has two provincial trial courts.  The "lower" level trial court is the Ontario Court of Justice. There are no jury trials in that court.  The "superior" level trial court is the Superior Court of Justice, which can have trials with or without juries.

The Ontario Court of Justice is sometimes referred to as "provincial court". The judges are appointed by the provincial government.  The equivalent court in BC is the Provincial Court of British Columbia.

The judges of the Superior Court of Justice are appointed by the federal government.  The equivalent courts in other provinces include the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the Court of Queen's Bench in Alberta.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2018, 00:52:42 by Privateer »

Offline FJAG

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 157,645
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,802
  • Ex Gladio Justicia
    • WordPress Page
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #598 on: September 10, 2018, 00:38:35 »
Sure you don't mean the Ontario Superior Court of Justice instead of the Ontario Supreme Court.
Two completely different courts.
I'm soon to report for jury duty and it's not for the Supreme Court but for the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

There are basically three courts in Ontario: The Ontario Court of Justice (which is the lowest trial level court and  equivalent to the "Provincial Court" in the CCC and many provinces and whose judges are appointed by the provinces and where all trials are by judge alone); the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (which is the superior trial court [aka Queen's Bench in some provinces] whose judges are appointed by the Feds and where trials can be by judge alone or with a jury; and the Court of Appeal.

There are three types of offences: summary conviction offences (which are tried in the Ontario Court of Justice); indictable offences (where the accused may have an election how he is tried); and hybrid offences (where the crown may first elect as to whether to proceed by summary conviction or indictment and, if the crown elects indictment, the accused may again have an election)

My knowledge of what is happening in the Norman case is sketchy and based on filing in the blanks from newspaper reports but I understand that he's been charged with "breach of trust" which I take it is probably s122 of the CCC:

Quote
122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.

This is a straight indictable offence and (because the term of sentence is limited to five years) is probably one where Norman was able to elect his method of trial. The options under s 536(2) of the CCC are: trial by judge alone before a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice; trial by judge alone of the Superior Court of Justice with or without a preliminary inquiry; and trial by judge and jury in the Superior Court of Justice with or without a preliminary inquiry. Note that if a preliminary inquiry is held it would be done before a judge alone of the Ontario Court of Justice to determine if there is sufficient evidence for the full trial to be heard. (Note also that the crown might still elect to have a preliminary inquiry where the accused elects not to.)

From what I can glean, Norman has elected to be tried by a judge alone in the Ontario Court of Justice which means that there will be no preliminary inquiry but it appears several pre-trial hearings have been set to deal with evidentiary matters. The start of the trial itself is set for Aug 19, 2019.

 :cheers:

Illegitimi non carborundum
Semper debeatis percutis ictu primo
Access my "Allies" book series at:
https://wolfriedel.wordpress.com

Offline Rifleman62

    Retired.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 84,725
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,843
Re: 16 Jan 2017 - VCDS relieved of duty
« Reply #599 on: October 13, 2018, 07:19:15 »

Post removed IAW site policy.

**Staff**


+300 « Last Edit: October 13, 2018, 10:20:18 by kratz »
Never Congratulate Yourself In Victory, Nor Blame Your Horses In Defeat - Old Cossack Expression