Depending on their occupational health.
If they belong to an stressed occupation- good luck.
If they belong to an overborne occupation with a long training backlog…maybe?
Well, there is still that pesky sensor/mission system design and integration piece. And cutting a bomb bay in pressure hull. And weapon release/separation trials. And airworthiness sign off.
10 years ago, that was all a bad bet against a hot P8 line and friendly Americans.
Now? We might be...
I will agree with your overall airframe numbers, but disagree with having 4 small Sqns. I think 405/407 each with 8 airframes is getting pretty sweet, with the rest for the OTU/maintenance swing. I also disagree with basing in NL. With the range and speed of the P8- what’s the point? You made...
I find it interesting that the consensus here seems to be that if the F35 ever became “no go” for Canada, that Rafale is the next best choice.
I would have thought Eurofighter, just on user base alone.
I continue to learn.
Because, after the HSR build consumes XXX billions over a decade or two, no Government is going to feel like subsidizing ticket prices so the average Joe can afford to use it. My sense, based on lots of history in Canada, is that HSR will be a boutique network that carry, what, sub- 10,000...
Having been to Germany and having ridden DB extensively, it was fun listening to the Germans bitch about DB service.
Ok-they left me in the lurch once with a missed connection due to construction. Otherwise, I thought they had a pretty sound rail system.
Sorry. I missed the sarcasm.
Low level, over the Ocean, is incredibly hard on aircraft.
The USN started to have issues with tail assembly fatigue in their P3 fleet in the mid 2010s and their airframes were younger than ours.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.