- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
I am a Reservist who began a class B contract in 2007 and was moved to the location of the contract at the expense of the Crown under CF IRP - APS 2006-2007 Policies.
My contract has now ended and I have asked for a return move to a third location. I am being told that the third location has to be at least 40 km from my current residence. I asked for clarification of this as the current CF IRP Policy does not have that stipulation - it just says under 13.09:
Reserve Force members may move to:
· their initial place of duty; or
· a 3rd location costs not to exceed relocation to their initial place of duty.
I have been told that I will not be administered under the CF IRP 2009 policies, but under the CF IRP 2006-2007 policies because that was the policies that were in existence when I accepted my contract of employment - even though I will be affecting my return move in 2012.
Is this correct? I can not find a policy to substantiate their decision. Usually it is the other way around - i.e. it does not matter what the old policy says - there is a new policy in place and that is what applies.
Can anyone provide me with some insight on this - it would be greatly appreciated.
My contract has now ended and I have asked for a return move to a third location. I am being told that the third location has to be at least 40 km from my current residence. I asked for clarification of this as the current CF IRP Policy does not have that stipulation - it just says under 13.09:
Reserve Force members may move to:
· their initial place of duty; or
· a 3rd location costs not to exceed relocation to their initial place of duty.
I have been told that I will not be administered under the CF IRP 2009 policies, but under the CF IRP 2006-2007 policies because that was the policies that were in existence when I accepted my contract of employment - even though I will be affecting my return move in 2012.
Is this correct? I can not find a policy to substantiate their decision. Usually it is the other way around - i.e. it does not matter what the old policy says - there is a new policy in place and that is what applies.
Can anyone provide me with some insight on this - it would be greatly appreciated.