• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Fixing up the army gives ottawa options

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAP
  • Start date Start date

GAP

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Donor
Mentor
Reaction score
24
Points
380
Fixing up the army gives ottawa options
By Nigel Hannaford, Calgary HeraldAugust 4, 2009
  Article Link

Just when things were starting to look tight for the Canadian Forces, the federal government has come to the rescue with several large funding announcements.

Is it recession-fighting stimulus?Maybe: It's an ill wind that blows nobody any good.

But, for a hard-worked military machine that was rapidly running out of everything, it was the help that was needed.

As recently as March, Chief of Land Staff Lt.-Gen. Andrew Leslie was warning a Senate committee that the army would have to take what he euphemistically described as a year's "operational pause" at the end of 2011.

Equipment was wearing out, in particular the versatile Light Armored Vehicle fleet that has done yeoman service in Afghanistan, but taken a pounding in the process. (Almost a third of the 650-strong fleet is said to be unserviceable. Leslie was concerned that very few would be in fighting trim by the end of the Canadian mission, set for July 2011.)

Also, while recruiting willing volunteers has turned out to be relatively easy since the army's active engagement in Afghanistan, the Canadian Forces nevertheless faces a skills bottleneck as time-served men and women retire before the next cadre is fully trained--often because of the sheer pace of army life.

Leslie is on record that, "At around the 15-to 20-year point, if there's a multiplicity of missions that they've been on, they get tired and their spousal folk at home say, 'You know what? This is your sixth mission and seventh mission in 20 years and it's time for you to think of something else.' "

No kidding.

Plus, apart from replacing retiring soldiers, the army is supposed to grow by 3,000 by the end of 2011.

That makes replacing junior leaders--subalterns (officers below the rank of captain) and non-commissioned officers (sergeants and corporals)--the huge challenge that it is, second only to the attrition of the LAV fleet as a factor limiting the army's operational effectiveness.

Now however, if things develop as promised, Leslie will still have a fighting army.
More on link
 
Couldn't the military possibly generate some revenue by selling all the "unserviceable" equipment/vehicles and such to civilians, if they don't already do so? (Assuming there isn't a mountain of red tape to do such a thing.)
 
1.  Assets are routinely sold off at the end of their useful life.  Generally, this is done by PWGSC.

2.  Funds generated revert to general revenue for the crown, and not to the selling department.

3.  Certain material acquired from foreign nations has disposal restrictions.  For example, weapons purchased or manufactured under license from the USA require US export permits prior to disposal.

4.  There are numerous considerations in dealing with disposal.  The MLVWs were in the news recently - the fleet is being sold off.  However, they are sufficiently old and decrepit that DND is not warranting the vehicles as being in operable condition - a matter of liability.

The great DND garage sale won't solve many/any problems - and the costs to administer such activities can be prohibitive.
 
Does this mean we can start making a wish list for Christmas?

Dear Ottawa.... I want a.....
 
Back
Top