• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

India, China compete in Indian Ocean

Mike Baker

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
1
Points
430
LINK


HAMBANTOTA, Sri Lanka (AP) -- This battered harbor town on Sri Lanka's southern tip, with its scrawny men selling even scrawnier fish, seems an unlikely focus for an emerging international competition over energy supply routes that fuel much of the global economy.

An impoverished place still recovering from the devastation of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Hambantota has a desolate air, a sense of nowhereness, punctuated by the realization that looking south over the expanse of ocean, the next landfall is Antarctica.

But just over the horizon runs one of the world's great trade arteries, the shipping lanes where thousands of vessels carry oil from the Middle East and raw materials to Asia, returning with television sets, toys and sneakers for European consumers.

These tankers provide 80 percent of China's oil and 65 percent of India's -- fuel desperately needed for the two countries' rapidly growing economies. Japan, too, is almost totally dependent on energy supplies shipped through the Indian Ocean.

Any disruption -- from terrorism, piracy, natural disaster or war -- could have devastating effects on these countries and, in an increasingly interdependent world, send ripples across the globe. When an unidentified ship attacked a Japanese oil tanker traveling through the Indian Ocean from South Korea to Saudi Arabia in April, the news sent oil prices to record highs.

For decades the world relied on the powerful U.S. Navy to protect this vital sea lane. But as India and China gain economic heft, they are moving to expand their control of the waterway, sparking a new -- and potentially dangerous -- rivalry between Asia's emerging giants.

China has given massive aid to Indian Ocean nations, signing friendship pacts, building ports in Pakistan and Bangladesh as well as Sri Lanka, and reportedly setting up a listening post on one of Myanmar's islands near the strategic Strait of Malacca.

Now, India is trying to parry China's moves. It beat out China for a port project in Myanmar. And, flush with cash from its expanding economy, India is beefing up its military, with the expansion seemingly aimed at China. Washington and, to a lesser extent, Tokyo are encouraging India's role as a counterweight to growing Chinese power.

Among China's latest moves is the billion dollar port its engineers are building in Sri Lanka, an island country just off India's southern coast.

The Chinese insist the Hambantota port is a purely commercial move, and by all appearances, it is. But some in India see ominous designs behind the project, while others in countries surrounding India like the idea. A 2004 Pentagon report called Beijing's effort to expand its presence in the region China's "string of pearls."

No one wants war, and relations between the two nations are now at their closest since a brief 1962 border war in which China quickly routed Indian forces. Last year, trade between India and China grew to $37 billion (€24.8 billion) and their two armies conducted their first-ever joint military exercise.

Still, the Indians worry about China's growing influence.

"Each pearl in the string is a link in a chain of the Chinese maritime presence," India's navy chief, Adm. Sureesh Mehta, said in a speech in January, expressing concern that naval forces operating out of ports established by the Chinese could "take control over the world energy jugular."

"It is a pincer movement," said Rahul Bedi, a South Asia analyst with London-based Jane's Defense Weekly. "That, together with the slap India got in 1962, keeps them awake at night."

B. Raman, a hawkish, retired Indian intelligence official, expressed the fears of some Indians over the Chinese-built ports, saying he believes they'll be used as naval bases to control the area.

"We cannot take them at face value. We cannot assume their intentions are benign," said Raman.

But Zhao Gancheng, a South Asia expert at the Chinese government-backed Shanghai Institute for International Studies, says ports like Hambantota are strictly commercial ventures. And Sri Lanka says the new port will be a windfall for its impoverished southern region.

With Sri Lanka's proximity to the shipping lane already making it a hub for transshipping containers between Europe and Asia, the new port will boost the country's annual cargo handling capacity from 6 million containers to some 23 million, said Priyath Wickrama, deputy director of the Sri Lankan Ports Authority.

Wickrama said a new facility was needed since the main port in the capital Colombo has no room to expand and Trincomalee port in the Northeast is caught in the middle of Sri Lanka's civil war. Hambantota will also have factories onsite producing cement and fertilizer for export, he said.

Meanwhile, India is clearly gearing its military expansion toward China rather than its longtime foe, and India has set up listening stations in Mozambique and Madagascar, in part to monitor Chinese movements, Bedi noted. It also has an air base in Kazakhstan and a space monitoring post in Mongolia -- both China's neighbors.

India has announced plans to have a fleet of aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines at sea in the next decade and recently tested nuclear-capable missiles that put China's major cities well in range. It is also reopening air force bases near the Chinese border.

Encouraging India's role as a counter to China, the U.S. has stepped up exercises with the Indian navy and last year sold it an American warship for the first time, the 17,000-ton amphibious transport dock USS Trenton. American defense contractors -- shut out from the lucrative Indian market during the long Cold War -- have been offering India's military everything from advanced fighter jets to anti-ship missiles.

"It is in our interest to develop this relationship," U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said during a visit to New Delhi in February. "Just as it is in the Indians' interest."

Officially, China says it's not worried about India's military buildup or its closer ties with the U.S. However, foreign analysts believe China is deeply concerned by the possibility of a U.S.-Indian military alliance.

Ian Storey of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore said China sent strong diplomatic messages expressing opposition to a massive naval exercise India held last year with the U.S., Japan, Singapore and Australia. And Bedi, the Jane's analyst, added "those exercises rattled the Chinese."

India's 2007 defense budget was about $21.7 billion (€14.1 billion), up 7.8 percent from 2006. China said its 2008 military budget would jump 17.6 percent to some $59 billion (€38.3 billion), following a similar increase last year. The U.S. estimates China's actual defense spending may be much higher.

Like India, China is focusing heavily on its navy, building an increasingly sophisticated submarine fleet that could eventually be one of the world's largest.

While analysts believe China's military buildup is mostly focused on preventing U.S. intervention in any conflict with Taiwan, India is still likely to persist in efforts to catch up as China expands its influence in what is essentially India's backyard. Meanwhile, Sri Lankans -- who have looked warily for centuries at vast India to the north -- welcome the Chinese investment in their country.

"Our lives are going to change," said 62-year-old Jayasena Senanayake, who has seen business grow at his roadside food stall since construction began on the nearby port. "What China is doing for us is very good."

Intresting read.
Baker
 
Anyone know the details of the Indian navy, I know they have a aircraft carrier but this dosnt automatically spell out blue water navy. China on the other hand is still a green water navy and unless they can protect their interests such as those ports or the listening station mentioned, this is still quite one sided.
 
Try this:

http://indiannavy.nic.in/ships.htm
 
More people are becoming aware of the changing situation:

http://www.torontosun.com/Comment/2008/07/26/pf-6270126.html

The jewel of India
Democracy helps nation emerge as an Asian power
By SALIM MANSUR

At the recent G-8 Summit in Hokkaido, Japan, the leaders of two non-member but invited states came from China and India, Asia's emerging giants.

There is a consensus among observers of world politics that power -- economic, political and military -- is shifting in the direction of Asia and away from Europe and the Atlantic basin.

India is China's natural counterweight in Asia. Though India is prudent in not displaying any overt posture of engaging Beijing as a rival, there is no mistaking that the world's largest functioning democracy is closing in on the world's largest totalitarian power in the two-country race for higher economic growth.

The latest volume of Foreign Policy discusses in its cover story India's economic performance of recent years as Asia's "new miracle." India's lesson for developing countries is that democracy provides for more sustainable economic growth, and the annual rate of growth is higher when society is open and free.

Sustaining high growth rates means acquiring more energy supply through increased oil imports, mining domestic coal resources and developing hydro power or building nuclear power plants. The environmental costs will vary depending on which energy path is pursued.

India's preference is for clean energy by building nuclear power plants and this will require procuring the newest civilian nuclear technology available with a secure fuel supply.

U.S. TIES

India's needs have pulled the country closer towards the United States with President George W. Bush reciprocating warmly. The significant aspect of this budding relationship is the U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Co-operation Initiative, also known as the 123 Agreement signed between the two governments.

This agreement will permit India to avail itself of new nuclear technology and fuel supply once the agreement is ratified by the U.S. Congress. India also is required to conclude a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and its board has indicated support for such agreement. There is a further requirement for a consensus decision by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) granting an India-specific exemption for the supply of nuclear fuel or uranium.

India's difficulty arises from its refusal to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), yet high regard for its democracy has helped in gaining support for the agreement.

Opponents of the agreement do not wish to see India rewarded while remaining outside of NPT, and they remain suspicious that with the agreement New Delhi will manoeuvre to lift constraints in domestic fuel supply for military purposes by securing external supply from NSG.

But Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has explained to opponents at home and abroad, while recently winning a confidence vote on this issue in India's parliament, that his government will not compromise its defence priorities nor retard the country's economic growth.

DEVELOPMENT

The agreement is intended for assisting India's development through provision of increased clean nuclear energy from plants under IAEA safeguards, and without India having to add higher levels of carbon emission to the atmosphere from rising imports of oil or increased use of coal.

Canada is a member of the NSG and by supporting the agreement Ottawa would signal its confidence in the strength and transparency of India's democracy, and of its important standing within the British Commonwealth and the Asia-Pacific region.

This is clearly what Washington appreciates and why President Bush has shown foresight in embracing India in a strategic partnership for a new century.
 
Back
Top