The 'peace movement' of which Hanoi Jane was a large part, was itself a myth. What they were after was not peace, it was defeat they wanted. Ask anyone who fled a communist country if 'peace' is what follows a communist takeover. The left of politics shows its dirtiest side during wartime, and they STILL support communist dictatorships. Last year, the leader of the worlds strongest dicatorship (China) and the worlds strongest democracy (USA) were here at the same time. One got plenty of attention, violent protests etc., the other largely escaped criticism by the protesters. Guess who copped the flak from the left? It's this support of whoever is our percieved enemy at the time, or who is behaving badly that we are trying to stop that p1sses me off. Automatically trying to oppose whatever we do actually seems fashionable. These shytes actually protested the first gulf war. I cant think of a clearer case for just use of armed forces than that war in recent times.