User:McG - Revision history

Thom786 at 08:04, 25 September 2006

2006-09-25T08:04:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 25 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I was thinking, with the unit list, changing the format to this:~~

	~~==Saskatchewan==~~
	~~===Regina===~~
	~~18 F Bty [[10th Field Artillery Regiment RCA]] <br>~~
	~~[[The Royal Regina Rifles]]<br>~~
	~~[[16 (Saskatchewan) Service Battalion]]<br>~~
	~~[[16 Field Ambulance (Regina & Saskatoon)]]<br>~~

	Then having the addresses on the unit pages themselves, that way the unit page won't be so long. We then make a whole bunch of "stubs" by making pages for the Svc Bns (and other unit types) with their addresses, even if there is nothing else. That way when people come accross it they can add themselves. I find it easier to add to something than create something new. I would like to know what you think. I have lots of time as my job hasn't started yet, so I can make the changes.<br>
	~~<br>~~
	~~[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)~~



	~~I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.~~
	~~http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Army_Reserve_Units_%28by_Location%29#St._Thomas~~

	~~----~~

	I've got all the time in the world, If you could just give me the command structure with empty links, I can do all the grunt work of filling the pages. The addresses are from my list, so I know most of the names and locations, but not the higher formations.
	~~<br>~~
	~~[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack jr.]] 15:57, 23 May 2006 (EDT)~~


	~~I've jsut been using the same pages linked from the brigade lists & lists of regiments.~~

Thom786 at 09:06, 24 May 2006

2006-05-24T09:06:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:06, 24 May 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<br>		<br>
	[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack jr.]] 15:57, 23 May 2006 (EDT)		[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack jr.]] 15:57, 23 May 2006 (EDT)


			I've jsut been using the same pages linked from the brigade lists & lists of regiments.

=RICE" at 19:57, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T19:57:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 23 May 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.		I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.
	http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Army_Reserve_Units_%28by_Location%29#St._Thomas		http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Army_Reserve_Units_%28by_Location%29#St._Thomas

			----

			I've got all the time in the world, If you could just give me the command structure with empty links, I can do all the grunt work of filling the pages. The addresses are from my list, so I know most of the names and locations, but not the higher formations.
			<br>
			[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack jr.]] 15:57, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

Thom786 at 03:51, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T03:51:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 23 May 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)		[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)

	I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.

			I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.
			http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Army_Reserve_Units_%28by_Location%29#St._Thomas

Thom786 at 03:47, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T03:47:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 23 May 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<br>		<br>
	[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)		[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)

			I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.

=RICE" at 03:42, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T03:42:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 23 May 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[[16 Field Ambulance (Regina & Saskatoon)]]<br>		[[16 Field Ambulance (Regina & Saskatoon)]]<br>

	Then having the addresses on the unit pages themselves, that way the page won't be so long.		Then having the addresses on the unit pages themselves, that way the unit page won't be so long. We then make a whole bunch of "stubs" by making pages for the Svc Bns (and other unit types) with their addresses, even if there is nothing else. That way when people come accross it they can add themselves. I find it easier to add to something than create something new. I would like to know what you think. I have lots of time as my job hasn't started yet, so I can make the changes.<br>
			<br>
			[[User:Vangemeren\|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)

=RICE" at 03:37, 23 May 2006

2006-05-23T03:37:30Z

New page

I was thinking, with the unit list, changing the format to this:

==Saskatchewan==
===Regina===
18 F Bty [[10th Field Artillery Regiment RCA]] <br>
[[The Royal Regina Rifles]]<br>
[[16 (Saskatchewan) Service Battalion]]<br>
[[16 Field Ambulance (Regina & Saskatoon)]]<br>

Then having the addresses on the unit pages themselves, that way the page won't be so long.