• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Hamas invaded Israel 2023

Here in Canada, survey says re: protest locations in general....
Archived here.
View attachment 84806
Deets on how it was done ....
View attachment 84807
Perhaps, but the schools should also expel all who take part.

Can people protest on any private property?

Sounds like the sort of thing you'd hear about from a failed state: inability to protect private property.
"No media is allowed inside to document the likely police abuses that will occur."

When did you stop beating your wife?
Caraballo is a notorious extremist.
 
Looks like NYPD has shut down external access to Columbia University and has massed public order units. Lots of various media getting posted about this now, but this is the best quick example I could find.


EDIT TO ADD: Apparently City College of New York as well. I didn't realize there were two schools both involved.
Typical of the media who don't like police.
 
Typical of the media who don't like police.

This is from her Wikipedia page.

Alejandra Caraballo ...; born 1990 or 1991[1]) is an American civil rights attorney and clinical instructor at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic. Caraballo is a transgender rights activist and has spoken out against anti-LGBT legislation, policies, and rhetoric.

Nothing in there qualifies her as being "media." Pretty much anyone with a computer can post on X.

🍻
 
So many bath water drinkers in masks, that fresh air is dangerous! Just shows you their mental state. These aren’t protestors, they are professional activists and likely Biden supporters!
 

View attachment 84854


Interested to see how police in Canada handle this situation, which is popping up all over the country now. 🍿
Given that it’s largely on university campuses, it’ll depend on the wishes of the school administrations to have assistance removing people from private property. I suspect that as a first step we’ll see school administrations seek injunctions to order the protesters to decamp. Schools will be reluctant to push things to the point of public order police clearing out encampments, but it may come to that in the face of threats to fundraising and endowments. I think McGill will be the bellwether as both the ‘farthest among’ protest, and also as a school serving a city with a sizeable and historic Jewish population, many of whom will have gone through the university and may now be applying political pressure.

Meanwhile in Vancouver: arrest and charges recommended for the protester who was leading chants in praise of October 7th.

 
Cut Federal funding to higher education institutions that allow anti semantic protests. Give them 10 days.

Oh, we have a gutless government that is only interested in votes.
 
Given that it’s largely on university campuses, it’ll depend on the wishes of the school administrations to have assistance removing people from private property. I suspect that as a first step we’ll see school administrations seek injunctions to order the protesters to decamp. Schools will be reluctant to push things to the point of public order police clearing out encampments, but it may come to that in the face of threats to fundraising and endowments. I think McGill will be the bellwether as both the ‘farthest among’ protest, and also as a school serving a city with a sizeable and historic Jewish population, many of whom will have gone through the university and may now be applying political pressure.

Meanwhile in Vancouver: arrest and charges recommended for the protester who was leading chants in praise of October 7th.


Saw a small snippet on CNN last night with Kevin O'Leary being interviewed. He discussed the use of AI face recognition technology in these (probably any type) of protest. It's going to be really hard for these people to get hired by large, high-paying corporations, especially if they're Jewish owned, if your face is flagged in the databases. You can protest all you want and be part of this illegal trespassing, but there are consequences.
 
I'm all for these kinds of things. For example, in the case of the convoy you get to see who supports personal freedoms and who doesn't, and in the case of these protests you get to see who supports terror and who doesn't.

And yes consequences will result. Whether those are election results or job availability, there will always be some sort of consequence.
 
Given that it’s largely on university campuses, it’ll depend on the wishes of the school administrations to have assistance removing people from private property. I suspect that as a first step we’ll see school administrations seek injunctions to order the protesters to decamp. Schools will be reluctant to push things to the point of public order police clearing out encampments, but it may come to that in the face of threats to fundraising and endowments. I think McGill will be the bellwether as both the ‘farthest among’ protest, and also as a school serving a city with a sizeable and historic Jewish population, many of whom will have gone through the university and may now be applying political pressure.

Meanwhile in Vancouver: arrest and charges recommended for the protester who was leading chants in praise of October 7th.

but what do you do when a judge, as in Montreal, refuses to issue a warrant? McGill tried
 
but what do you do when a judge, as in Montreal, refuses to issue a warrant? McGill tried

McGill did not try, and there was no warrant involved. Two individual students tried to get an injunction prohibiting the protesters from occupying areas within x distance any McGill buildings. Basically the two applicants went way outside anything they could justify asking for as private citizens.

If McGill itself were to ask for an injunction order the protestors to decamp from McGill property it would likely be quickly granted. For comparison, see the injunctions issued by the court in B.C. against protesters blocking logging roads at Fairy Creek.
 
Saw a small snippet on CNN last night with Kevin O'Leary being interviewed. He discussed the use of AI face recognition technology in these (probably any type) of protest. It's going to be really hard for these people to get hired by large, high-paying corporations, especially if they're Jewish owned, if your face is flagged in the databases. You can protest all you want and be part of this illegal trespassing, but there are consequences.
That’s OK. They can all be LPC,NDP or Green Party candidates, workers and lobbyists.
 
McGill did not try, and there was no warrant involved. Two individual students tried to get an injunction prohibiting the protesters from occupying areas within x distance any McGill buildings. Basically the two applicants went way outside anything they could justify asking for as private citizens.

If McGill itself were to ask for an injunction order the protestors to decamp from McGill property it would likely be quickly granted. For comparison, see the injunctions issued by the court in B.C. against protesters blocking logging roads at Fairy Creek.
The main reason the injunction was not granted was because the applicants have to demonstrate irreparable harm that will or is reasonably foreseeable to occur to them personally if the injunction is not granted. The two applicants could not demonstrate they were being harmed because they apparently made the application on behalf of students who actually were and are being irreparably harmed. In other words, the applicants case lacked merit insofar as they were personally, directly concerned. Other persons affected, such as the University itself, probably could demonstrate irreparable harm, but they did not form part of this application. I would add the remedy being sought was a civil remedy and nothing more than that was cogently advanced by the applicants.
 
“If McGill itself were to ask for an injunction order the protestors to decamp from McGill property it would likely be quickly granted. For comparison, see the injunctions issued by the court in B.C. against protesters blocking logging roads at Fairy Creek”

McGill would have to frame that as trespass with proof of ongoing harm, damage and foreseeable liability for injury if they did not attempt to control and contain the situation using lawful means including but not limited to pursuing an injunction. That does not infer any duty whatsoever to negotiate with terrorist supporters, political insurrectionists and anarchist Marxists.
 
Back
Top