My reference was to the "non-amateurs" who thought they could bulldoze Saddam Hussein and replace him with some kind of pathway to moderate democracy; some of those people are still writing opinions and I suspect many readers don't know what those people did and what they stand for. The effects of that are still unwinding, resulting in massive very real (as in: not on paper) losses, and won't correct as quickly as a stock market index. The point is that many people are either very selective in their criticisms (based mostly, I suppose, on plain old emotional partisanship), or simply forget any particular thing about three months after it happens, or have no sense of proportion.
Trump's is a different kind of incompetence and ignorance writ larger; it doesn't mean the "old way" was always better. If we had objective (utilitarian) measures of human welfare, we might be surprised by which is worse. If we were to tally breaches of "democratic norms", the people opposed to Trump have torn down their share of fences.
Did anyone notice how easily the BC NDP wilted under the recent unexpected political difficulty and tried to give themselves extraordinarily anti-democratic powers? That sh!t runs a lot deeper in a number of political rivers than Trump's.