July 2024: Two GTA men arrested, charged with terrorism linked to ISIS

[brihard]

FYI Deportation is a thing not only for cases like this, but lesser crimes. We have deported at least two to Somalia.....one to Australia and a few others I cannot recall the details on. And this is from a small jail in Manitoba.

Yup- “serious criminality”; generally means either actually sentenced to six months or more in custody, or convicted of an offense that carries a maximum of at least ten years, regardless of what sentence you actually get.

 

[KevinB]

These guys. I don’t care where they go, just get them the hell out of Canada.

The immigration interview of questionable applicants should be done by a woman wearing a tank top and lulu lemon shorts and the applicants reaction will surely indicate their suitability of becoming a citizen of Canada.

Drop them at the 10mile mark somewhere in the North Atlantic, preferably in the October to Feb time frame…

In a tank top and Lululemon pants.

Then quote Bill Cosby’s Noah ‘how long can you tread water’.

 

[The Bread Guy]

Or an exceptionally flamboyant out-of-the-closet-and-proud gay man.

To be fair to the prospective immigrant, if social media is any indication, there’s more than one Canadian who wouldn’t make it through that interview these days

 

[OldSolduer]

Drop them at the 10mile mark somewhere in the North Atlantic, preferably in the October to Feb time frame…

In a tank top and Lululemon pants.

Then quote Bill Cosby’s Noah ‘how long can you tread water’.

Save the Lulus please, won't anyone think of the Lulus? Woe is me!!

 

[The Bread Guy]

OK, then ....

Canada taking review of immigration screening of terror plot suspects 'extremely seriously,' PM Trudeau says

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the federal government is taking an internal review into the immigration and screening of a father and son recently charged in connection to an alleged foiled Toronto terror plot 'extremely seriously.'

www.ctvnews.ca

From the piece ....

 

[McG]

But how many more security risks have been let it? Half of what has been identified plus whatever goes unnoticed.

Ottawa allowed in half of foreign nationals red-flagged as security risks, audit finds

Nearly half of foreign nationals flagged by security agencies to the immigration department for ties to serious offences like war crimes, espionage and terrorism were allowed into the country anyways between 2014 and 2019.

nationalpost.com

 

[dimsum]

But how many more security risks have been let it? Half of what has been identified plus whatever goes unnoticed.

Ottawa allowed in half of foreign nationals red-flagged as security risks, audit finds

Nearly half of foreign nationals flagged by security agencies to the immigration department for ties to serious offences like war crimes, espionage and terrorism were allowed into the country anyways between 2014 and 2019.

nationalpost.com

Honest question: So if an organization is designated a terrorist organization after some of its members have already been allowed in (because it wasn’t designated then), do those get counted in the stats as “Canada allows terrorists in”, or not?

 

[lenaitch]

But how many more security risks have been let it? Half of what has been identified plus whatever goes unnoticed.

Ottawa allowed in half of foreign nationals red-flagged as security risks, audit finds

Nearly half of foreign nationals flagged by security agencies to the immigration department for ties to serious offences like war crimes, espionage and terrorism were allowed into the country anyways between 2014 and 2019.

nationalpost.com

From the article:

If an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible to Canada on serious grounds such as violating human rights or organized crime, an exemption can be granted if “it is deemed that the entry of this person is in Canada’s interest,” she said.​

Some thing about turd and clean end comes to mind.

 

[dapaterson]

From the article:

If an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible to Canada on serious grounds such as violating human rights or organized crime, an exemption can be granted if “it is deemed that the entry of this person is in Canada’s interest,” she said.​

Some thing about turd and clean end comes to mind.

The US Space Program comes to mind.

 

[dimsum]

From the article:

If an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible to Canada on serious grounds such as violating human rights or organized crime, an exemption can be granted if “it is deemed that the entry of this person is in Canada’s interest,” she said.​

Some thing about turd and clean end comes to mind.

Would diplomats or their families/staff be subject to that as well? Or does diplomatic immunity cover it?

 

[brihard]

Would diplomats or their families/staff be subject to that as well? Or does diplomatic immunity cover it?

Canada could elect not to grant diplomatic accreditation. There’s definitely screening for diplomatic accreditation requests.

 

[SeaKingTacco]

The US Space Program comes to mind.

I see what you did there, Julie…