BYT Driver said:
But, isn't there already enough squadrons here? (424, 426, 435, 436, 437)
Yes, each one has specific missions and mandates that makes them all seperate entities. Is it that the old way of being used to compromising and dual hats. Is there a new way of thinking going on in the Air Force?
Yes, you're right BYT ... we're moving to very specific missions/roles now ... away from that "multi role" money saving posture that we've had jammed down our throats for so many years ... where each unit was an all singing, all dancing, jack of all trades and master of none ... timeframe.
But, to add to the "specificity" of each unit will be the gradual loss of Wing Maintenance as each unit will be operating it's own specific airframe that is no longer useable by another unit in another role. Amalgamated maintenance will no longer be applicable.
437 will keep it's A310/CC150 Airbus and it's "Strategic Transport" role ... and it will soon begin assuming the AAR role as well.
436 will keep it's CC130 E/H until the J model starts to come on line and it will keep it's "Tactical Transport" role.
424 will keep doing SAR using the Cormorant and the CC130s will slide over to them entirely once the J model delivery is done.
429 will have the new CC177 and the Strategic/Tactical Transport Role.
426 will keep it's job as the main CC130 school house.
And don't forget 412 who is a lodger unit of 8 Wing, although they're based out of Ottawa.
I look foward to the day when we're back to Sqn Maintenance and I see maintainers wearing the Sqn patch on their uniform and we get back to some "pride of ownership" of our aircraft.
All the infrastructure change and personnel change is going to make for some chaos at 8 Wing - but it will be a positive chaos since, like you said .... "we're getting new airframes and trucks".