Don't assume, it makes an *** out of you and me...I sense you calling Infidel an a**...
No sorry. The assumption wasn’t between me and infidel. But rather MikeH and I back a few pages. So me making the assumption would be making an *** out of you and me...I sense you calling Leonidio one. Not infidel. But I forgive your ignorance to the saying. Nor did I ever intend to call anyone an idiot or anything. I accept that I am an idiot, but it’s by choice oddly though and my friend who is doing a psychology degree, thinks I am crazy for doing it. I just find that when people think you’re going to be the best it’s nothing special when you do turn up being the best. So I have more fun showing up as an idiot or the quiet person and when I show up the best it’s something cool.
The one thing I find very odd with this forum, other than the only proper English rule, is how credibility is something really big despite how anonymous people are to begin with. Take Leonidio for example, he was trying to come off as an expert or at least informed person, but since he was getting his information from a game website.
My assumption was because of how cruddy the thread got from Leonidio and in normal method of consistency is that the questions go along with the current subject, going back to his post he said he was learning to reload. But I didn’t recall his post at all except someone was asking where to buy a chronograph.
Sure the assumption was wrong, it doesn’t make me an idiot, I read through 3 more pages of replies before posting my reply. But to go along the same post above; honestly I don’t care what people think of me. If you really were to see my biography you’d diagnose me with MPD with all the different techniques and methods I use in my speech and text.
Arguing in philosophy: This is something I do very often, I will be completely 100% logical, rational, proper, articulate, and etc.
Arguing fundy Christians: This is when they simply won’t concede themselves as wrong and simply will resort to ad hominems and other annoyingness to the maximus; I then drop proper and articulate and get the point across.
Talk about the news: I tell it how it is, logic and reason only used.
Everything has it’s own style. But this has gotten well off course. Let’s get back to the thread. I have one odd question.
Say for instance, suppressors/silencers are very little cost compared to the actual gun. It has been said that the life of the suppressors can last just as long as the barrel of the gun. It’s also been said that they don’t really affect the bullet very much.
Why don’t all marksmen use a suppressor? As the advantage of nobody being able to tell where you were when you took that shot is pretty good.
Actually one more question. I was reading of a built-in silencer for a SVD variant. How would that differ from the interchangeable suppressors?