Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 11,132
- Points
- 1,260
That is normally what should happen.....over my 32 years I've seen about 10 guys sign their release while actually serving their sentence.
Do most wish they had gone to club Ed ?
That is normally what should happen.....over my 32 years I've seen about 10 guys sign their release while actually serving their sentence.
That's the way I read the judgment. The Court refers to discussions with NB Corrections about counselling services.It is unlikely that she will go to the CFSPDB to serve her sentence. Generally, those being released are dealt with in accordance with the Notes to QR&O 104.04 and "will typically be transferred to a civilian prison or penitentiary as soon as practical within the first 30 days following the date of sentencing. The member will ordinarily be released from the Canadian Forces before such a transfer is effected". In the sentencing decision can be found the following:
Once Ms. Cogswell's (I used a civilian title) appeals have run their course, my expectation is she will be spending that 30 days at the New Brunswick Women's Correctional Centre.
She's absolutely retarded if she appeals - The Prosecution was asking for a Year MIN, she doesn't have a leg to stand on, and the Federal Appeals Court might find the Trial Judge erred in the Sentencing...It is unlikely that she will go to the CFSPDB to serve her sentence. Generally, those being released are dealt with in accordance with the Notes to QR&O 104.04 and "will typically be transferred to a civilian prison or penitentiary as soon as practical within the first 30 days following the date of sentencing. The member will ordinarily be released from the Canadian Forces before such a transfer is effected". In the sentencing decision can be found the following:
Once Ms. Cogswell's (I used a civilian title) appeals have run their course, my expectation is she will be spending that 30 days at the New Brunswick Women's Correctional Centre.
Did she ever. Anil Kapoor really knows his shit in the federal realm. He’s friggin’ excellent. She picked very good and likely quite pricey counsel.Of note, the appellant used civilian legal counsel for the appeal.
She can try, but likely wouldn’t be given leave to have the case heard at that level. The CMAC decision was unanimous, so there’s not appeal as of right to the SCC. Absent some really compelling question of law, SCC would probably nope it.I'm glad that the CMAC upheld both conviction and sentence. I wonder if she's going to push it up to the SCC....
She's batshit crazy.From what I can see, the appeal appears to have been focused on technical, chain of custody of evidence grounds. If you can get the evidence tossed, the conviction goes as well.
Which was only reduction in rank, kicked out of the CF and 30 days in jail! Should have gotten a heck of lot more time in the Crowbar Hotel!I don’t understand why the F she appealed. She was lucky with what she got initially.
She was a Reservists. Tuesday nights and one weekend a month!I wonder if she's just serving weekends .
I think this is a good point.Could someone file a lawsuit against the crown for allowing an employee to bring in home made food and sell/provide it through the canteen?
Could she be held liable for damages or something along those lines? Reading the impact statement it sounds like there's going to be VAC claims submitted.