We can back track a mortar bomb in flight by radar but we can't predict the targets of an ICBM in flight?

Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle - Wikipedia

We can back track a mortar bomb in flight by radar but we can't predict the targets of an ICBM in flight?
![]()
Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Maneuverable reentry vehicle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The discussion was about cruise missiles which no, you can't track to their target from point of launch. And I guess Article 5 wouldn't come into the conversation at all?We can back track a mortar bomb in flight by radar but we can't predict the target of an ICBM in flight?
A warning shot in the wilds of Canada (Edmonton is pretty wild) would track with the slow motion escalation and threats that Vlad has been demonstrating. And I don't think a US President would retaliate until he saw a mushroom cloud on US soil.
The discussion was about cruise missiles which no, you can't track to their target from point of launch. And I guess Article 5 wouldn't come into the conversation at all?
I don't think anybody is suggesting that we get rid of the existing FOLs and I doubt many would argue against expanding the number and the quality of the facilities at them. What is being questioned is if the FOLs should be permanently manned 24/7/365 vs deployed to when the threat situation makes it appropriate.
Again, if a bunch of Russian bombers are detected by NORAD entering our airspace I'm betting that a whole bunch of ICBMs will be incoming at the same time (and US spy satellites will almost certainly have detected Russia moving its strategic forces to heightened readiness and we would have deployed our forces as appropriate).
Hopefully the NORAD upgrades which are supposed to include over the horizon radars will help with the detection of aircraft coming over the Arctic (and if climate change actually results in parts of the Arctic Ocean becoming ice free we could potentially have radar picket ships there as well.I’m actually more worried about the single aircraft/flight of aircraft that get thru, launch before being detected or engaged. An “Enola Gay” sortie.
Put that together with a “close coastal” shot from something like a Borei class and you’ve got the making for some real trouble.
Russia resumes bomber, submarine patrols near North America: Norad
Russia has started sending long-range bombers back over the Arctic toward North American airspace following a short-lived pause during the early months of its war in Ukraine, according to a senior Canadian military official.beta.ctvnews.ca
Those are the soldiers without internal parasites.We'd better up our game in the arctic training department
What temperature is it when you want a balaclava but no shirtWe'd better up our game in the arctic training department
I guess it's time to update the CAF Hats/Gloves flowchart!What temperature is it when you want a balaclava but no shirt![]()
Canadian content alert! Rheinmetall is using an Argo from ODG as the base on that unit.Interesting choice of armament ....
![]()
A warning shot into Edmonton area even Ft Mcmurray would garner a very quick response from the US. The product coming out of those two areas if disrupted for to long will cause issues south of the border.We can back track a mortar bomb in flight by radar but we can't predict the target of an ICBM in flight?
A warning shot in the wilds of Canada (Edmonton is pretty wild) would track with the slow motion escalation and threats that Vlad has been demonstrating. And I don't think a US President would retaliate until he saw a mushroom cloud on US soil.
I guess it's time to update the CAF Hats/Gloves flowchart!
I think it was sarcasmWhy update something that was as official as note written on a bathroom stall door?
I happily ignores that stupidity.