It's all about the money. When FN bands, sign treaties and become governments, they suddenly realize that the capital burnrate is higher than they realize and will be tossing the environmental groups off their land in order to get projects that bring in revenue. In the meantime they fight with each other over grant monies.Maybe you should have 'self-identified' when you had the chance
As millions in federal funding flow into a Labrador group whose claims of Inuit identity have been rejected by Indigenous organizations across Canada, a national Inuit leader worries the Liberal government is putting the rights of Indigenous Peoples at risk.
Natan Obed, president of an organization representing about 70,000 Inuit across Canada, said he wrote to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over a year ago to express his concern about the NunatuKavut Community Council's ability to receive federal grants and fisheries allocations based on a "simple self-declaration of Inuit identity."
He said he has not received a response.
Self-identifying Indigenous group got $74M in federal cash, Inuit leader wants change
As millions in federal funding flow into a Labrador group whose claims of Inuit identity have been rejected by Indigenous organizations across Canada, a national Inuit leader worries the Liberal government is putting the rights of Indigenous Peoples at risk.www.ctvnews.ca
Too specific, indeed - hence the merge. Thanks for the nudgeThread title is incorrect…
Natan Obed, president of an organization representing about 70,000 Inuit across Canada, said he wrote to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over a year ago to express his concern about the NunatuKavut Community Council's ability to receive federal grants and fisheries allocations based on a "simple self-declaration of Inuit identity."
This is kind of the logical end state for the government though. They aren't going to be seen to be denying indigenous people their entitlements. Particularly when the indigenous governments/groups seem to want to hold the power to grant or deny access to programmes at their whim, rather than based on genetic data or genealogy.Maybe you should have 'self-identified' when you had the chance
As millions in federal funding flow into a Labrador group whose claims of Inuit identity have been rejected by Indigenous organizations across Canada, a national Inuit leader worries the Liberal government is putting the rights of Indigenous Peoples at risk.
Natan Obed, president of an organization representing about 70,000 Inuit across Canada, said he wrote to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over a year ago to express his concern about the NunatuKavut Community Council's ability to receive federal grants and fisheries allocations based on a "simple self-declaration of Inuit identity."
He said he has not received a response.
Self-identifying Indigenous group got $74M in federal cash, Inuit leader wants change
As millions in federal funding flow into a Labrador group whose claims of Inuit identity have been rejected by Indigenous organizations across Canada, a national Inuit leader worries the Liberal government is putting the rights of Indigenous Peoples at risk.www.ctvnews.ca
100%, most Canadians don’t realize that drinking water is usually handled by your municipality.I agree with the Lawyers on this one. There are lot's of rural Canadians that do not get supplied waters by any level of government.
What the government(s) can do is provide interest free loans with generous loans for the bands to upgrade their water supply on their own. I would only caveat that if there had been a contamination of their supply by a government permitted work, then the government owes them a duty.
So other than the cost to fly equipment in/out, what is the reason someone can't just drill a well for each household? (Like the one on my front lawn that I am totally responsible for?)
Let's be pragmatic. A lot do that money would disappear and people would just be back in line asking for more.What the government(s) can do is provide interest free loans with generous loans for the bands to upgrade their water supply on their own.
And who keeps pocketing the money?Let's be pragmatic. A lot do that money would disappear and people would just be back in line asking for more.
IMO the Indian Act and our system of reserves doesn't work when it comes to providing modern safe and clean living conditions. It's just a failed system we keep throwing billions of dollars at.
Because it's your front yard. FN territory land is held by the Crown 'in trust'. I suppose the government could hire a bunch of crews and start drilling individual wells, but they would still be federal wells. Also, I'm not sure about the viability of drilled wells in the Boreal.So other than the cost to fly equipment in/out, what is the reason someone can't just drill a well for each household? (Like the one on my front lawn that I am totally responsible for?)
Aquifers aren't equally distributed, nor of reliable size or consistent depth.So other than the cost to fly equipment in/out, what is the reason someone can't just drill a well for each household? (Like the one on my front lawn that I am totally responsible for?)
In addition to this ....So other than the cost to fly equipment in/out, what is the reason someone can't just drill a well for each household? (Like the one on my front lawn that I am totally responsible for?)
... this is big:Aquifers aren't equally distributed, nor of reliable size or consistent depth.
Since Big Fed is where the buck stops (cost & liability) for a lot of stuff on reserve, I suspect there would be generally fewer, more localized issues dealing with one communal water system than with dozens of individual, in-home water systems. Some communities have the community capacity/expertise to maintain a ton of different systems, others not so much.... FN territory land is held by the Crown 'in trust'. I suppose the government could hire a bunch of crews and start drilling individual wells, but they would still be federal wells ..
Sure, but that would require a legislative change and funding transfer. They might be 'municipal-like' but they are not municipalities. Reserve lands are 'children of the federal government'; municipalities are 'children of the province'. Without some form of agreement, provincial law doesn't apply on a Reserve and there is no way municipal taxpayers are going to willingly fund expenditures on Reserve land.Funding might be a federal responsibility, but at the lowest level local governance should be looking after "municipal" infrastructure.
The point is that whatever a community needs, it has to provide for itself: the people who live there have to maintain it, even though they need not provide all of the work force to build it.Sure, but that would require a legislative change and funding transfer. They might be 'municipal-like' but they are not municipalities. Reserve lands are 'children of the federal government'; municipalities are 'children of the province'. Without some form of agreement, provincial law doesn't apply on a Reserve and there is no way municipal taxpayers are going to willingly fund expenditures on Reserve land.