• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Future Helicopters

Given they had TOW and other capabilities mounted years decades ago shouldn’t be a challenge. 😉
No doubt someone will find a way to mess it all up

A few years from now it will be deployed tactically with a flex mount MG.
I beg to differ. A loudspeaker with virtue signaling recordings of JT et al telling everyone how nice we are.
 
The irony is this helicopter (as the BK-117 in the day) was the preferred candidate for the CFLH (Canadian Forces Light Helicopter) to replace the CH-136 Kiowa in the late-80s/esrly-90s.
CFLH was cancelled in 1989, one day after every other White Paper equipment promise was murdered.

It was stealthier than them, perhaps, but not quite stealthy enough.
 
CFLH was cancelled in 1989, one day after every other White Paper equipment promise was murdered.

It was stealthier than them, perhaps, but not quite stealthy enough.
It didn’t die its final death until 1992….April 30, 1992 to be exact.
 
Several countries have MOU’s with the Army to provide for the ability of them to buy into the program. I suspect that many want to wait till fielding has begun to see if it is an actually viable solution, or if it will be more like the Osprey and/or have considerably high drag to FOC

DAR has observers at both US FVL and NATO NGFC. It's the reason why the GLLE has been purposely restricted to just get that fleet through to early 2030s. They didn't even allow discussions about weapons and survivability investments. They are hoping to jump on a replacement fleet sooner than later.

Some of this work has also been informed by the air warfare center (RAWC) end their nTACS study (next Tactical Aviation Capability Set) that is quite FVL biased. But that was put out in the early days of Ukraine. They'll be adjusting based on experience.

I'm curious to see not just what we buy (the ever present dream of single type) but also how Tac Avn changes. All the suggested replacements are much larger and more capable. That has to/will drive organizational and doctrinal changes.
 
DAR has observers at both US FVL and NATO NGFC. It's the reason why the GLLE has been purposely restricted to just get that fleet through to early 2030s. They didn't even allow discussions about weapons and survivability investments. They are hoping to jump on a replacement fleet sooner than later.

Some of this work has also been informed by the air warfare center (RAWC) end their nTACS study (next Tactical Aviation Capability Set) that is quite FVL biased. But that was put out in the early days of Ukraine. They'll be adjusting based on experience.

I'm curious to see not just what we buy (the ever present dream of single type) but also how Tac Avn changes. All the suggested replacements are much larger and more capable. That has to/will drive organizational and doctrinal changes.
It was my (albet limited) understanding that the nTACS requires a multi platform approach. Some crewed and some uncrewed.

There is also a strong emphasis on range for Arctic and long Canadian flights, both for arctic operations and disaster response. Some of this was likely developed more recently given Ukraine and the sudden shift in Arctic operations.
 
Well given Congress wants to ground the Ospreys potentially for good, one may be able to get a screaming deal on rarely used and only crashed once airframes there ;)
 
Well given Congress wants to ground the Ospreys potentially for good, one may be able to get a screaming deal on rarely used and only crashed once airframes there ;)
What would be the replacement? Hooks? H-53s?
 
What would be the replacement? Hooks? H-53s?
USMC would probably get more Super Stallions, USAF ones I’m not sure, as their only other bird currently are Hawks.

I’m curious what the tilt rotor issue and skittishness may do to FVL movement with the Army and the rest of DoD.
 
USMC would probably get more Super Stallions, USAF ones I’m not sure, as their only other bird currently are Hawks.

I’m curious what the tilt rotor issue and skittishness may do to FVL movement with the Army and the rest of DoD.
The big difference in the Valour is that the shaft tilts not the entire engine. When you tilt engines we all know that gravity starts messing with your fuel, lubricant feeds, combustion suffers etc... tilting the shaft is a different set of problems but largely easier to deal with than an entire engine.
 
Back
Top