Case against Minneapolis officers appears to be unraveling
Might have to re-think the thread title a little bit.
The judge handed Derek 22.5 years.
Maybe after the appeal.
Case against Minneapolis officers appears to be unraveling
Might have to re-think the thread title a little bit.
The judge handed Derek 22.5 years.
At least this went the way it should.
Still faces charges in federal court on violating Mr. Floyd's civil rights. No trial date has been set.
The three other fired officers have yet to have their state trials
Could well be. As it stands, he’s a convicted murderer, and we all saw what he did, and what he failed to do. You simply don’t do that. I fully agree about the right to a fair trial, and if there is an appeal and a new trial based on that, so be it.Seeing as one of the jurors admitted - multiple times - to lying to the judge about an automatic disqualification (attending a protest against the accused), and another juror claimed they were going to declare him guilty no matter what, an appeal seems likely.
A right to a fair trial must be upheld, no matter what scumbag is before the court.
Judging by Mr Floyd criminal record, they are better off with the cash. I wonder if any of the families of his victims can now go after that cash?The taxpayers of Minneapolis also wrote a cheque for $27M US payable to Mr. Floyd's family for their loss.
Although money can never bring him back to them.
That’s a very good question. I guess it depends on US and Minnesota law.Judging by Mr Floyd criminal record, they are better off with the cash. I wonder if any of the families of his victims can now go after that cash?
For reference to the discussion, another recent Minnesota case.I wonder if any of the families of his victims can now go after that cash?
As ex-Brooklyn Center, MN, police officer Kim Potter is awaiting a manslaughter trial in the death of 20-year-old Daunte Wright, victims of Wright's alleged gun violence are suing his estate.
As Derek Chauvin’s defense attorney attempted to shift blame from the former Minneapolis police officer in George Floyd’s death, he questioned paramedics on delays in their efforts to resuscitate Floyd.
But one paramedic told jurors that he thought Floyd was already dead when he checked for a pulse while Chauvin was still pinning Floyd to the ground.
Both paramedics testified that they saw no sign that Floyd was alive at that point.
Paramedic Derek Smith testified that after checking for a pulse and not finding one, he quickly concluded: “In layman’s terms? I thought he was dead.”
Officer Thomas Lane told a paramedic, “We were basically just restraining him until you guys got here.”
But Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo has testified officers are trained in basic first aid, including chest compressions, and department policy requires them to provide necessary aid as soon as possible before paramedics arrive.
The indictment alleges that all four defendants saw Mr. Floyd lying on the ground in clear need of medical care and willfully failed to aid him. The indictment alleges that by doing so, all four defendants willfully deprived Mr. Floyd of his constitutional right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law, which includes an arrestee’s right to be free from a police officer’s deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The indictment alleges that this offense resulted in bodily injury to, and the death of, Mr. Floyd.
It appears that the statute of limitations in Minnesota varies between 2 and 6 years. The more serious torts are on the lower end of that time frame.That’s a very good question. I guess it depends on US and Minnesota law.
With the proliferation of social media and the 24 hour news media; can an unbiased jury be reasonably expected anymore ?Seeing as one of the jurors admitted - multiple times - to lying to the judge about an automatic disqualification (attending a protest against the accused), and another juror claimed they were going to declare him guilty no matter what, an appeal seems likely.
A right to a fair trial must be upheld, no matter what scumbag is before the court.
In related news, another "deadly restraint" lawsuit coming to trial.
This time against the City and County of Fresno, California.
Paramedic has police help him make a "psycho sandwich" ... patient dies.
Deadly restraint: Internal records reveal what officers, paramedics did and why
Action News has unearthed new records from the investigation into how a Fresno man died while restrained by law enforcement.abc30.com
Right.What a terrible situation to be thrust into, on both accounts.
"He was pretty much fighting the whole time," the paramedic said to internal affairs investigators. "I mean, it took a little bit of force to try to keep him down on the board on top of him. And continued to keep yelling. And then at some point, he became unresponsive."