GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,951
- Points
- 960
Oh I don't know , mind you that appreciation could be pretty short lived depending on the circumstances...
Infantry Vehicles
- Thread starter KevinB
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,428
- Points
- 1,090
yeah i dont understand what that means. Our cutting edge alone was 2.5" and you can tilt the bucket vertical
markppcli
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 7,037
- Points
- 1,260
I like that they pretty much admit the BMP3 is a pile of shit design.
KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 24,786
- Points
- 1,260
Well that wasn’t exactly an unknown, but I was surprised the Russians admitted that. Their tank evaluation was also remarkably frank.
PrairieFella
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,903
- Points
- 960
Hope the authors don't have any windows in their office.
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 13,517
- Points
- 1,160
Even their tank evaluations in WWII were pretty good and very technical based.
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 1,090
Yah the lying comes later when they say they fixed the problem.
markppcli
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 7,037
- Points
- 1,260
I mean who new having the troop compartment essentially under the turret would be awkward
KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 24,786
- Points
- 1,260
Well the VDV solved that with their BMD “convertible model”, just ride in the open top seating…
I wonder how that briefed or how it went from BMD-1 to BMD-4 and no one ever stoped to consider the dismount losses. I guess 56 years isn’t enough time to make a change…
Maxman1
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,936
- Points
- 1,160
Still beats the BTR with the door in between two of the wheels.
