• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

MoD reveals Anglians' casualty rate

3rd Herd

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
410
Found this article and it has some interesting points which reflect on some of the issuses here in Canada.
The Usual Disclaimer.
MoD reveals Anglians' casualty rate
MARK NICHOLLS

The full horror and intensity of the Royal Anglian Regiment's ongoing mission in Afghanistan has been revealed after details emerged of an alarming casualty rate among troops.

Three soldiers from the 1st Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment - which recruits in Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire - have been confirmed killed in action in operations against the Taliban during operation in Helmand province in the last few weeks.

But more significantly, the number of soldiers injured - some severely - has now been released to the Eastern Daily Press.

The Ministry of Defence is traditionally reluctant to give full details of casualties - citing reasons of operational security - but the EDP can reveal that at the half-way stage of the six-month deployment, a further 40 troops have been injured, several of them with what are described as life-changing injuries.

The news also comes after it emerged that two of the three members of the armed forces killed in a mortar attack on their base at Basra in southern Iraq were from RAF Honington.

The 1st Battalion Royal Anglians, nicknamed The Vikings and with 600 soldiers in Helmand, has had significant successes in driving Taliban forces from their strongholds across troubled Helmand province since they deployed to the troubled province in April.

But the regiment has now revealed that those advances have come at a high price.

And now the battalion's commanding officer, Lt Col Stuart Carver, intends to establish a memorial fund for those killed from the current deployment.

It will also help support those injured and have the aim of assisting soldiers who are able to continue their military careers rather than being medically discharged from the army.

Military analysts and charities have praised the battalion for setting up the fund but stress the government needs to do more to help and support injured service personnel.

Details of the 1 R Anglian Afghanistan Memorial Fund have been announced by the battalion's adjutant, Capt Mark Nicholas from Norwich. He spoke of the demanding nature of the deployment and said: “As we approach the halfway point of our six-month tour, the battalion has suffered three fatalities and over 40 soldiers have been injured as a result of enemy action.”

Capt Nicholas added: “For many, the nature of the injuries sustained will impact on the rest of their lives. Some will suffer permanent disability and others may be restricted in what they can physically achieve. It is the commanding officer's intention to establish a fund that will provide for a permanent memorial in East Anglia to the memory of those who have died. The fund will also offer assistance to the immediate families of those who have died and to those soldiers who have been severely injured in the interest of them continuing a full military career.”

The three soldiers killed were Pte Chris Gray, 19, the victim of a Taliban bullet on April 13; Cpl Darren Bonner, 31, who died on May 28 when the vehicle he was in hit a mine and L/Cpl George Davey, 23, who died in a firearms accident. Many more have been injured, some losing limbs, sustaining bullet wounds or fragmentation wounds.

And there have been examples of great courage, notably when L/Cpl Oliver Ruecker braved bullets and rockets to rescue his badly injured comrade Cpl Dean Bailey from a burning troop carrier. The Norfolk soldier could be recommended for the Victoria Cross.

The Vikings have driven the Taliban from strongholds and brought security to the northern sector of the province.

The death toll among British service personnel in Afghanistan since oper-ations began in November 2001 is 64.

Keith Simpson, mid-Norfolk Tory MP and a military historian, said people in the UK barely understood the intensity and ferocity of the operations facing British personnel in Afghanistan. “They are in daily fire fights, which is quite different to the occasional sniper in the days of Northern Ireland and there are more getting injured. Many are coming home physically and mentally damaged,” he said. “What the Royal Anglians are doing with this fund is commendable... but the government needs to be doing more, voluntary charities set up by regiments cannot be seen as a substitute for bigger commitment from the government.”

Adrian Allenby, county field officer (Norfolk) for the Royal British Legion, said it was getting more inquiries for help from younger soldiers who have served in Afghanistan and Iraq. He said: “It is those injured who may have to make lifestyle changes and their families that are most affected. They may have to leave the service and move out of military accommodation and we are there to support and give advice with benefits or retraining and resettlement.”

To donate to the 1 R Anglian Afghanistan Memorial Fund, make cheques payable to CB 1 R Anglian and send them to Major R C Barrett, Treasurer, 1 R Anglian Afghanistan Memorial Fund, Elizabeth Barracks, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0DT.
http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=News&tBrand=edponline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED21%20Jul%202007%2010%3A03%3A01%3A480

 
The usual Disclaimer:
Latest soldier killed in Afghanistan named
By Emma Henry and agencies
Last Updated: 2:01pm BST 14/08/2007

The latest British soldier to be killed in Afghanistan's volatile Helmand province was named by the Ministry of Defence today as Captain David Hicks.

Capt Hicks, from 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, died after his patrol base was attacked on Saturday, despite being flown by helicopter to Camp Bastion. Five other soldiers suffered minor injuries in the attack, the MoD said.

Captain Hicks, 26, was the sixth British serviceman to die in a week, and the second soldier to be killed in as many days in Afghanistan. Four soldiers have been killed in Iraq since last Monday.

Capt Hicks, who had previously served in Bosnia and Iraq before deploying to Afghanistan in March this year, had been involved in a number of battles.

The MoD said that at the time of his death he was acting as Company Commander and had commanded a number of patrols fighting deep into Taliban territory. He died as he coordinated the response to the attack on his Company's patrol base, the MoD said

L/col Stuart Carver said the captain was an outstanding officer who would be sorely missed by his battalion. "It is typical of him that he had led from the forward position during the attack on his Company, in order to best direct the battle and provide an inspiring example to his men.

"Even after being mortally wounded his only concern was to get back into position to control the fight.

"Highly professional with a genuine concern for his soldiers, he typified the highest standards of leadership and commanded genuine respect from all who served with him," he said.

Colleagues described him as a leader of men, who had a unique sense of humour and was a good friend.

Captain Hicks' partner Nicola Billen said he was "a loving son, brother of Gareth and Edward and partner, kind-hearted and fun-loving: a true gentleman".

His parents described their son, who studied at Oundle and University College London before joining the Army, as "a young, professional officer doing a difficult job in extremely challenging circumstances".

In a statement, they said: "It was a job he wanted to do and he was under no illusions about the dangers he faced.

"He was totally committed both to his role and his fellow soldiers and he fervently believed that he was contributing to building a better world."

The officer from Wokingham, Berks was the latest casualty of the increasingly violent battle for control of Helmand province between coalition forces and the Taliban.

Last week, senior commander L/col Richard Westley said forces had been successful in driving insurgents out of 60 per cent of the important parts of the crucial "Green Zone".

But intense fighting has seen the military death toll escalating in recent months.

Seventy people have died in Afghanistan since operations began in the country in November 2001, with eight being killed since the start of July alone.

Concerns have been raised that, if it continues at this pace, the fatality rate among British service personnel in the country could outstrip the death rate suffered by UK forces in the Second World War.

Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, said this week a "long-term commitment" in Afghanistan was essential to prevent its return to being a training ground for terrorists.
 
To the fallen, the injured, the families, friends and comrades

The gratitude of every home in our land, and indeed throughout the world, except in the abodes of the guilty, goes out to the British soldiers who, undaunted by odds, unwearied in their constant challenge and mortal danger, are turning the tide of the War by their prowess and by their devotion. Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few. All hearts go out to the fighting soldiers, whose brilliant actions we see with our own eyes day after day…


(my thanks to Sir Winston Churchill for these tremendous words!)

CHIMO!
 
"Of its total forces in Afghanistan, only 1,500 are classified as front-line troops. It's these troops that have been taking a heavy pounding from Taliban insurgents in Helmand, which neighbours Kandahar province where Canadian forces took heavy casualties last year.

The hardest hit have been the Royal Anglians Regiment, which has lost a fifth of its troops to battle wounds, injuries and disease as 131 soldiers out of a 650-strong force have fallen out of combat duty.

These losses are comparable with those suffered by Commonwealth troops during the Second World War, when 11 per cent of the 11 million troops mobilized were either killed, wounded or declared missing in action.

These recent revelations, though based on math that is not entirely scientific as the past few weeks have seen a higher death rate in Afghanistan than previous weeks and the comparison is between front-line troops in Afghanistan, and all Second World War troops,.."

Source:

BRETT POPPLEWELL "British losing faith as Afghan toll climbs" Globe and Mail August 16, 2007 at 3:41 AM EDT
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070816.wafghanbrits16/BNStory/Afghanistan/home



 
The usual disclaimer:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/20/nafg120.xml
'Cover-up' over casualties in Afghanistan
By Thomas Harding Defence Correspondent
Last Updated: 4:02am BST 20/08/2007

The Government was accused of hiding the true casualty rate of troops in Afghanistan yesterday as it emerged that nearly one in two soldiers fighting on the front line had been wounded.

The Conservatives claimed that the Ministry of Defence was guilty of deception and not giving the full picture on the number of wounded despite being asked to do so in Parliamentary questions.
The shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said there was a discrepancy over the recording of casualties and claimed that the rate was far higher than Government figures.

Although the Government had promised to give the Tories fuller information on the number of wounded it had never arrived, he said.

The row broke as the head of the Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, said troops were currently operating on the limit.

The Chief of the General Staff was visiting troops at Camp Price in Gereshk, southwestern Afghanistan yesterday. He said the mounting death toll in the country should not overshadow the success forces were having on the ground.

Military sources yesterday put the number of Servicemen injured on the front line at 700 out of 1,500 combat troops since April. Medical conditions included shrapnel wounds, cuts, burns, heat stroke and diarrhoea.

Mr Fox said there was a vast discrepancy over recording casualties. The American reported nine wounded for every fatality whereas the British reported three wounded for every dead soldier. "We believe the casualty rate is higher than the Government is reporting," he told the BBC's The World This Weekend.

On the same programme Bob Ainsworth, the Armed Forces minister, hit back. "What possible motive would there be for anyone in Government to hide casualty figures?" he said. "It's complete and utter nonsense to suggest that we do. We are not hiding casualty figures for Afghanistan, Iraq or anywhere else."

He added that the MoD released a comprehensive list on the internet every fortnight of casualty figures for those wounded in action or suffering illnesses.

Doctors would rather do their job than the "bureaucratic nonsense" of recording every time someone suffered a minor injury or illness, he said.

The latest MoD figures showed that since 2001 there have been 751 personnel admitted to field hospitals for various ailments and 70 troops have been killed. More than 25,000 have served in Afghanistan over the period. An MoD spokesman said: "While we do not publish statistics for all personnel who require minor treatment, we do record details for all personnel who are admitted to our field hospitals with more serious injuries and with diseases."

Gen Dannatt admitted that his troops were "certainly stretched" and doing more work than he would like.
"We can be busy, we can be stretched, we can run hot - provided we are looking after individuals," he said in his first comments about the Army's operations since he admitted last year that the presence of British soldiers was sometimes part of the problem in Iraq.

Yesterday he said he felt "pride and admiration" for the young soldiers who were "winning our tactical engagements".

"Of course, tragically, we take casualties from time to time. I don't want to get into a numbers count, but the Taliban have taken a lot more casualties than we have," he said.

Amid headlines comparing casualty figures in Helmand province to those in the Second World War, the Chief of the General Staff said it would be a "tragedy" if the public did not realise the significance of what soldiers are doing there.

"Yes of course this is tough, and in a tough fight we are bound, from time to time, to have fatalities and of course that's tragic," he said.

He added that battles being fought at a platoon level in Afghanistan were "very, very intense" and could have been replicated in Normandy in 1944 or during the Korean War.

"It is really, really intense, it is life-threatening, it is life-taking here in Afghanistan," he said.

MOD links:
Iraq
http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/5432EC89-EBF5-496C-84CC-6D5F2B019B0F/0/opteliccasultytables31july2007.pdf

Afghanistan
http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/8E46EE29-DAD9-4655-BDCC-E17033C639AF/0/opherrickcasultytables31july2007.pdf
 
If the boys come down with a case of heat stroke or diareah it's a big government cover-up?
Come on! ya gotta be kidding!
Are they going to be counting the number of bandaids and tongue depressors dispensed in a six month period too?
 
Was it not just a few months ago when someone published the number of condoms used in a specific period......
 
In a muslim country?

Condoms musta been for use while on leave.... or to keep dust outa the barel of their rifles :)
 
But if it is not pointed out in the article, then the impressions left are entirely those of the reader....
 
Back
Top