- Reaction score
- 198
- Points
- 1,210
Not a bad idea, the equipment forum is growing pretty fast... Any other opinions on it?
Guess there was not much popular support.Mike Bobbitt said:Not a bad idea, the equipment forum is growing pretty fast... Any other opinions on it?
Yard Ape said:I was thinking a "Combat Arms" forum within the section "The Field". I know each combat arm has its own forum, but this would provide a shared forum for common issues of combat team/battle group tactics, training, kit, etc.
Bruce Monkhouse said:I've often thought the combat arms should all be together
Instead of a Combat Arms Forum, I think a Strategy, Doctrine, and Tactics forum would see more traffic and provide broader arcs including interaction between the Cbt Arms and CSS (while still generaly covering most of the same potential thread topics as a Cbt Arms forum).Yard Ape said:I prefer to see them seperate (as is), but I would also be a frequent contributor to a all combat arms forum.
That is basically the same thing as the one I've titled "Field Force" except that it would also include discusions of deployable formations (the CMBGs and CBGs).Infanteer said:I think that a suitable title (on top of all the branch forums) would be a "Combined Arms" forum