RHFC_piper
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 160
The legal argument aside; why would this member stay with an organization he disagrees with and finds so much fault in?
It would seem more logical for a person with such convictions to NOT be involved in the organization they're opposed to... ???
In my twisted thinking, this is the same as a vegetarian working at an abattoir.
I realize that this person probably wants to remain in the forces and just apposes the mission, but, there is a difference between morally objecting* and remaining a professional soldier (especially in the reserve system... where tours are voluntary) and morally objecting, openly rejecting and denouncing the actions of your peers (especially without experience or proof), repeatedly, and being completely unprofessional.... This member did the latter... which, again, makes me wonder why??
*before someone jumps on me for this one; soldiers can have a moral objection to the nature of a mission; that's the beauty of democracy and freedom of beliefs... it is only an issue if this objection interferes with the soldiers duty; then it is an issue of 'do your job or leave'. Professionalism can be measure with how a soldier reacts to this situation.
I've known of members objecting to operational deployment and, instead of publicly denouncing it, they opted for the professional resort and left the forces. (or in the reserve situation; just not apply for deployment)
I'm sure this could be debated for hours, and it has in other threads... The long and the short of it is that this member acted very unprofessionally, especially when he has absolutely no obligation to serve... To me is seems like, and please forgive the term; an attention wh0re.
</my $0.02>
It would seem more logical for a person with such convictions to NOT be involved in the organization they're opposed to... ???
In my twisted thinking, this is the same as a vegetarian working at an abattoir.
I realize that this person probably wants to remain in the forces and just apposes the mission, but, there is a difference between morally objecting* and remaining a professional soldier (especially in the reserve system... where tours are voluntary) and morally objecting, openly rejecting and denouncing the actions of your peers (especially without experience or proof), repeatedly, and being completely unprofessional.... This member did the latter... which, again, makes me wonder why??
*before someone jumps on me for this one; soldiers can have a moral objection to the nature of a mission; that's the beauty of democracy and freedom of beliefs... it is only an issue if this objection interferes with the soldiers duty; then it is an issue of 'do your job or leave'. Professionalism can be measure with how a soldier reacts to this situation.
I've known of members objecting to operational deployment and, instead of publicly denouncing it, they opted for the professional resort and left the forces. (or in the reserve situation; just not apply for deployment)
I'm sure this could be debated for hours, and it has in other threads... The long and the short of it is that this member acted very unprofessionally, especially when he has absolutely no obligation to serve... To me is seems like, and please forgive the term; an attention wh0re.
</my $0.02>