This is spawned by the current discussions about reserves on overseas tours.
Selfishness (Self"ish*ness) n.
1. Meanly close and covetous; one who spends grudgingly; a stingy, parsimonous fellow; a miser.
2. The quality or state of being selfish; meanness in giving or spending; parsimony; stinginess.
3. The quality or state of being selfish; exclusive regard to one's own interest or happiness; that supreme self-love or self-preference which leads a person to direct his purposes to the advancement of his own interest, power, or happiness, without regarding those of others.
My interest is with the third definition above.
Coming from the reserve community I acknowledge the pick and choose aspect of the reserve commitment to overseas deployments. I echo other poster's ideas on the concept of 'pony-up cowboy' and join the regular force if you want good tours based on events such as the large number of soldiers from the western infantry regiment who refused to sign their second BEs based that they had joined after 9-11, spent three years hearing how the army was overtasked, and then never got an overseas deployment in their short time in. I fully acknowledge that there is a larger scale plan to the use of reservists in the managed readiness cycle. I know that there is a reason behind their deployment, which brings me to the definition above.
The army is overtasked. I am not talking about tours alone here I am talking more about the training system. Most training institutions have a number of positions that could probably be lumped under the ITCB or ARE (Army Reserve Establishment). Basically we need reservists to start filling vacant positions within the training establishment in order to relive buzzwords like 'pers op tempo' but basically so we can stop hitting the field force to provide individual augmentation.
One fundamental assumption I will make is that if you take two instructors, ceteris paribus, the one with operational experience will make a better instructor. It appears to me that one of the reasons we want reservists with op experience is so they can pass those lessons on.
My fundamental critique of the system is that reservists are selfish. They all want the gongs that come with overseas deployments. There is a distinct lack of ethics that compiles the average reservists to 'pony-up' to the training system.
Someone tell me reservists aren't selfish. Someone tell me that a reservist coming off Op ARCHER will gladly commit his/her next summer or next time off from an employer thinking about the betterment of the army and take a callout at an area training centre or CTC. Someone tell me that the average reservist who wants a tour isn't doing it for the gong, or the money, or the experience but acknowledges that he/she is a part of the Canadian Armed Forces and has an obligation as defined under the new leadership doctrine to pass that information on to the Canadian Armed Forces as a whole. There is more to being a professional than going on tours, there are other aspects to the job as well.
Someone tell me that the reserves are professional.
Someone tell me the reserves aren't selfish.
(PS - I did search and considered adding this to the thread on TF 1-06 Reserve Employment or Reserve A-stan Tour in 2007)
Selfishness (Self"ish*ness) n.
1. Meanly close and covetous; one who spends grudgingly; a stingy, parsimonous fellow; a miser.
2. The quality or state of being selfish; meanness in giving or spending; parsimony; stinginess.
3. The quality or state of being selfish; exclusive regard to one's own interest or happiness; that supreme self-love or self-preference which leads a person to direct his purposes to the advancement of his own interest, power, or happiness, without regarding those of others.
My interest is with the third definition above.
Coming from the reserve community I acknowledge the pick and choose aspect of the reserve commitment to overseas deployments. I echo other poster's ideas on the concept of 'pony-up cowboy' and join the regular force if you want good tours based on events such as the large number of soldiers from the western infantry regiment who refused to sign their second BEs based that they had joined after 9-11, spent three years hearing how the army was overtasked, and then never got an overseas deployment in their short time in. I fully acknowledge that there is a larger scale plan to the use of reservists in the managed readiness cycle. I know that there is a reason behind their deployment, which brings me to the definition above.
The army is overtasked. I am not talking about tours alone here I am talking more about the training system. Most training institutions have a number of positions that could probably be lumped under the ITCB or ARE (Army Reserve Establishment). Basically we need reservists to start filling vacant positions within the training establishment in order to relive buzzwords like 'pers op tempo' but basically so we can stop hitting the field force to provide individual augmentation.
One fundamental assumption I will make is that if you take two instructors, ceteris paribus, the one with operational experience will make a better instructor. It appears to me that one of the reasons we want reservists with op experience is so they can pass those lessons on.
My fundamental critique of the system is that reservists are selfish. They all want the gongs that come with overseas deployments. There is a distinct lack of ethics that compiles the average reservists to 'pony-up' to the training system.
Someone tell me reservists aren't selfish. Someone tell me that a reservist coming off Op ARCHER will gladly commit his/her next summer or next time off from an employer thinking about the betterment of the army and take a callout at an area training centre or CTC. Someone tell me that the average reservist who wants a tour isn't doing it for the gong, or the money, or the experience but acknowledges that he/she is a part of the Canadian Armed Forces and has an obligation as defined under the new leadership doctrine to pass that information on to the Canadian Armed Forces as a whole. There is more to being a professional than going on tours, there are other aspects to the job as well.
Someone tell me that the reserves are professional.
Someone tell me the reserves aren't selfish.
(PS - I did search and considered adding this to the thread on TF 1-06 Reserve Employment or Reserve A-stan Tour in 2007)