• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Sources: U.S. to arm local Afghans to fight Taliban - CNN

Yrys

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
11
Points
430
Sources: U.S. to arm local Afghans to fight Taliban

WASHINGTON (CNN)  -- The U.S. military plans to help the Afghanistan government recruit,
train and arm local Afghans to fight a resurgent Taliban, U.S. military officials say. U.S.
officials describe the proposal as a "community-based" security effort.

The main job of the local units is to be an "early warning system" and be armed mainly for
defensive operations, a U.S. military official said. Participants will get uniforms so they can
be readily identified, officials said.

The first phase of the program is expected to begin next year in Wardak province, where
the Taliban have overrun many local government institutions. For the United States, the
most sensitive part of the proposal will be the use of American military funds to purchase
small arms, most likely AK-47 rifles, that will be given to local Afghans, according to a U.S.
military official.

U.S. commanders acknowledge concerns that arming local groups is risky, as it could lead
to new armed conflicts between tribes, putting American troops in the middle of unexpected
firefights.

The Afghan government will select men for the new security program. It will train them and
technically arm them, although the funds will come from the U.S. military. The Afghans will
be responsible for ensuring the loyalty of people in the program, but the United States will
oversee the effort and collect biometric information, such as eyeprints and fingerprints, on
all participants, according to the U.S. military official.

U.S. officials are emphasizing that because of tribal diversity, the Afghan program differs
from the Awakening Councils in Iraq, which include tens of thousands of Sunni gunmen and
was credited with helping reduce violence there.
 
well... double edged knife.... cuts both ways.
Providing arms and some ammunition could help villagers - make them feel more confident about dealing with the local bullies.  Considering that the baddies already have arms, how much more of a "backfire" could this cause ???
 
Yrys said:
Sources: U.S. to arm local Afghans to fight Taliban

The Afghan government will select men for the new security program. It will train them and
technically arm them, although the funds will come from the U.S. military. The Afghans will
be responsible for ensuring the loyalty of people in the program, but the United States will
oversee the effort and collect biometric information, such as eyeprints and fingerprints, on
all participants, according to the U.S. military official.

U.S. officials are emphasizing that because of tribal diversity, the Afghan program differs
from the Awakening Councils in Iraq, which include tens of thousands of Sunni gunmen and
was credited with helping reduce violence there.

There will be some rhyme and reason to the program (hope it works). It won't just be a sack of guns and ammo tossed out to folks "toys for tots" style.
 
GDawg said:
There will be some rhyme and reason to the program (hope it works). It won't just be a sack of guns and ammo tossed out to folks "toys for tots" style.

I think that was the concern for a lot of people that the US would toss down a pile of rifles and leave it at that. Thanks GD
 
If you filed out your profile, we'd know where you are coming from experience wise. You'll note a significant number of the members here have one or multiple tours in Afghanistan, dealing with the exact villages and Taliban you are trying to know.

The US is not going to go around giving everyone and their uncle a weapon. Specific groups with long histories of supporting Coalition troops will be given a present or "thank you gift" from the US government in terms of weaponry and limited ammunition. Yes, this could backfire and ignite some tribal tensions, but don't you think the US State Department and DoD would have spent countless hours planning who and where they should provide these "gifts"? This is much similar to the Mujahideen, the US didn't give every villager a Stinger missile. Those weapons were kept in the control of US friendly fighters, and trusted individuals.
 
A good point PuckChaser.  The history of coalition participation in the region certainly supports your caveats to those who might think this is a toys for tots handout.  My concern is that the probability of blowback is much greater now than it was 10 years ago concerning the worldwide escalation of conflicts.  It there was ever a candidate for the ingredients of a WW3 - we're living it right this second.

Happy hunting!
 
Wasn't this how the Taliban were armed in the first place, when they were mujahid fighting the soviets? This has a horrifying chance of coming back to bite us pretty hard.
 
Back
Top