- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
Ok why is it we have all of our air force squadrons in the 400 series while there is a lone man out with 103 Squadron? Why the odd departure in sequence?
Ex-Dragoon said:Ok why is it we have all of our air force squadrons in the 400 series while there is a lone man out with 103 Squadron? Why the odd departure in sequence?
Ex-Dragoon said:thanks guys thats clears it up.
recceguy said:Then there is VU32, VU33 & MR880. Utility and Maritime Reconnaissance Squadrons
George Wallace said:A very brief history of many of the Sqns can be found at http://www.rcaf.com/Â
Ex-Dragoon said:So from Georges reply#5 if the military so chooses, can they reform the above mentioned squadrons?
Formed at St. Hubert on 1 March 1953, No. 444 Squadron bore the first new number (i.e. which had no war-time predecessor) in the post-war R.C.A.F. Six months later the squadron flew its Sabres overseas on "Leapfrog 4". The squadron joined No. 4 (Fighter) Wing at Baden-Soellingen, Germany in September. Selected as one of eight squadrons of the Air Division to be re-equipped with CF-104 Starfighter aircraft for a nuclear strike role, it was deactivated on 1 March 1963 and reactivated as Strike Attack on 27 May. When the Air Division was reduced to six squadrons, the squadron was once more deactivated on 1 April 1967. No. 444 Squadron was reformed as the air element of 1 Canadian Mechanized Brigade group stationed in Lahr, West Germany. The unit was equipped with CH-112 Nomad and CH-136 Kiowa helicopters.
In 1993, the squadron formed again at 5 Wing Goose Bay as 444 Combat Support Squadron equipped with the CH-146 Griffon.
cdnaviator said:Those sqn ( VU 32 and 33) were renumbered later on to a 400 series......880 remained until the end of the CP-121 Tracker
recceguy said:IIRC, VU 32 & VU 33 were disbanded in 92. 880 MRS was taken to zero strength in 1990, but has not been disbanded.
Astrodog said:A Slight hijack here, When 439 and 425 merged they kept the 425 name.. I Understand this was due to 425 being a historic french-Canadian squadron.. Now when 441 and 416 came together, would it not have been a better cost-saving measure to keep one of the squadrons active and have them consolodate into an existing squadron? 409 seems to be an odd choice, especially the motto of 'midnight is our noon' being a little odd for a non-night fighter specific TFS squadron. If I am not mistaken when the east coast CP-140 Squadrons merged they also kept one of the existing squadrons active, can anybody comment on this?