Brihard said:
Not precisely. Homicide is one person killing another. It includes justified killing, such as in self defense or defense of another, or in combat for that matter. Murder is homicide without legal justification.
Humphrey Bogart said:
Murder is a synonym of homicide.
Feel free to put me on ignore if you wish. You'll never agree with what I have to say anyways and even if you did, you would never admit it
Thanks for finally admitting my point. You stopped short on what might be considered other circumstances though. Most importantly, mental capacity. I'll wait for a doctor's diagnoses for that from the Coroner's Investigation, they'll have access to all his med docs, and I will not wildly speculate on someone's condition. No matter what a journalist or someone diagnosing with a list of symptoms tells me. It may not have been PTSD at all, maybe he did do it on purpose. No one here knows, so no one should be making judgement on him, until they do. You guys always hammer me for facts, gotta have facts or it's bullshit. None of you have facts, other than what has been reported, if it was factual, and whatever supports your biases but you decided he was a murderer and crow it at every opportunity.
He's not a murderer until it's proven. Got that? So everyone can stop calling him that until it is proven. Whether PTSD had anything to do with it, will be determined later by professionals. And nobody here is qualified to judge. Nobody here knows the facts but you've all decided anyway, by trying to read into the story what fits your narrative from the news. I am not defending his actions, nor the reasons. If you're going to call someone a murderer, you better be damn sure he is, and right now you can't. You can guess and surmise, but it doesn't make anyone right.
Quit vilifying him until you know what you're talking about. There's a shattered family and community out there, don't make it worse for them with your crass, unproven theories and name calling.
Disagree with everything you say? Would never admit it? Short memory there HB. I said nothing of ignore, other than not being drawn into this. Something I failed at miserably and immediately but intend to correct right now. I don't care your feelings on the subject or motivation. The only judgement of yours bothering me is your calling him a murderer without cause.
What I do find odd is the ruckus and vindictiveness of this case. I don't recall similar when the last similar incident happened down east a few months back. Maybe my memory is going.
I'm sorry guys. Maybe I'm not being clear or maybe I'm missing something. All I'm asking for is some patience, without resorting to mayhem and to stop using such jarring and incorrect (at this point) monikers as "Murderer". I'll not defend one way or another at this point whether it was the PTSD or not. I don't have a clue, but it does deserve to be raised. As does every other possible known cause. Even if I had the facts, I'm not sure as a layman, whether I would be able to draw out the nuances of the words like a physician might.
"He's a murderer, and his PTSD defence (as forwarded by a journalist) is bullshit" (paraphrasing a general feeling here guys, not calling anyone out), is not the way to investigate nor is it truthful, until proven. Please remember that. If it turn's out that he is a cold blooded killer, I have no problem as long as we did our best to understand why it happened, without the baggage of preconceived stigmas.
Hopefully, I'm done now.