• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Why Most Leaders (Even Thomas Jefferson) Are Replaceable

daftandbarmy

Army.ca Dinosaur
Reaction score
31,022
Points
1,160
Why Most Leaders (Even Thomas Jefferson) Are Replaceable

Harvard Business School Assistant Professor Gautam Mukunda leads off his new book, Indispensable: When Leaders Really Matter, with the results of social science research that executives may wish not to consider: individual leaders rarely make a difference.

Although many heads of organizations would like to think of themselves as truly indispensable—impact makers, history movers, culture changers—few reach the bar set by Steve Jobs, Napoleon, or Martin Luther King Jr., Mukunda says. (Even some people you might think would be shoo-ins for the indispensable category don't make Mukunda's cut, including Thomas Jefferson and Jack Welch. More on them later.)

Under most circumstances, a leader is elected or appointed. And it makes no difference who ends up in power so long as the person is experienced and is hired through the structured processes that most organizations use to vet everyone from CEOs to military officers to presidential candidates, Mukunda says.

"Are individual leaders truly responsible for the end result, or do they just happen to be there, for better or worse?" Mukunda asks. "We revere Lincoln. He must matter. But it's not so clear that that this is the case, and it is certainly not clear that every leader matters."

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/7038.html?wknews=09052012


 
"Unfiltered leaders are much more likely to have a high impact," Mukunda says. "Unfiltered leaders will do extremely well or extremely poorly. Everything else boils out of that."

Interesting article.

He points out that some leaders are replaceable talking heads that arent of any real value and the other type that rise to the occasion and mobilize people, he calls them 'unfiltered leaders'. 
He wants to find a way to identify, elect and ultimately keep in check these 'unfiltered leaders' for CEO positions and government.

It sounds great but, I don't see the point if they're going to be held in line by scared visionless board members.  He didn't say that's what would happen but I think it was implied...
 
I'm not so sure most people would want to work for an "unfiltered leader".

Bosses like Napoleon, Genghis Khan or Vlad Tepes are rather hard on their underlings....
 
Back
Top