He’s also attempting to deny past quotes…also ages well.hmm Trump quote ages well
He’s also attempting to deny past quotes…also ages well.hmm Trump quote ages well
If the defence appeals and wins doesn't, in and of itself, mean "the system" is corrupt. It's more of a reflection that the system is populated by humans, and humans are fallible. If the decision is appealled all the way to the SCOTUS, regardless of the outcome, there will be set of people who see its decision - whichever way it goes - as evidence of corruption.The entire process can be exhausted and wrongful convictions still stand. I suppose that means part of the "process" - more informal than formal - allows for people to keep digging at something and push for a case to be re-opened, but that implies they had a critical view all along and if the conviction is overturned, maybe the critical view was always valid. Obviously "the system" isn't, and can't be, perfect. The window for criticism is always open.
Corruption exists everywhere. Conceivably some of government in NY, including its prosecutors and judiciary, are corrupt - even very corrupt. "Machine" politics aren't an urban legend.
Discussions on this site occasionally touch on the problems created by the examples set by people in charge in corporations, or in the CAF. Why would anyone believe that doesn't apply everywhere? Alvin Bragg openly vowed to "Get Trump". Who knows what mischief that set in motion among the people in the institution under him, quite apart from their own political leanings in a heavily Democrat-supporting jurisdiction?
If the system needs people to think it isn't rigged, it has to act as if it isn't rigged. It won't do to complain about the perceptions people take away when the appearances of impropriety are so manifest. The onus is on the system to be proper and look proper.
Sure, corruption in parts of the system doesn't mean the whole system is corrupt.If the defence appeals and wins doesn't, in and of itself, mean "the system" is corrupt. It's more of a reflection that the system is populated by humans, and humans are fallible.
They already do. Alito and Thomas are under pressure to recuse from SC cases which concern matters about which their wives' political involvement is thought to be compromising. None of the opinion pieces I've read advocating this had anything to say about Merchan and his family's Democratic connections. Obviously there's partisan bias in how justice is perceived.If the decision is appealled all the way to the SCOTUS, regardless of the outcome, there will be set of people who see its decision - whichever way it goes - as evidence of corruption.
I would infer that the intent was distance and concealment. Have Cohen pay it and then reimburse him gradually over months, so Trump’s name was never directly on it. Indeed, Trump himself referred to a series of payments to Cohen as ‘reimbursements’ rather than legal fees.What I don't get in all this is why Trump let Cohen leverage his home equity to pay the NDA.
Couldn't he just pay it himself?
Is this the heart of the case? This deception? To what end?
Yeah, so it does seem like there's a mental element here, an intent to conceal something. So then the question is to what end? Was it really to "promote a candidate"?I would infer that the intent was distance and concealment. Have Cohen pay it and then reimburse him gradually over months, so Trump’s name was never directly on it. Indeed, Trump himself referred to a series of payments to Cohen as ‘reimbursements’ rather than legal fees.
Yeah, so it does seem like there's a mental element here, an intent to conceal something. So then the question is to what end? Was it really to "promote a candidate"?
That's the part I find dubious and would like to see the jurisprudence on this. It's not like Cohen went and bought ads with that money. He fulfilled DJT's end of an NDA. Seems like a stretch to tie it to the campaign, however close it might have been to the election.
2nd Amendment grift email in 3… 2… 1…Latest consequence: no more concealed weapon permit for YOU!
N.Y.P.D. Moves to Revoke Trump’s License to Carry a Gun
Former President Donald J. Trump had a concealed carry license and had three pistols.www.nytimes.comTrump's Gun License Expected to Be Revoked by NYPD Following Criminal Conviction
Donald Trump's gun license is expected to be revoked by the New York Police Department after he was found guilty on 34 felony counts.www.rollingstone.comPost-conviction move by NYPD may ensure Trump can’t just shoot someone on 5th Avenue
Donald Trump, who once bragged he "could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone" without losing supporters, will likely be barred from owning a gun in the state he once called home.lawandcrime.com
Which could be countered by a "Donald Trump wants convicted felons to be able to concealed carry" narrative if someone was brave enough2nd Amendment grift email in 3… 2… 1…
I’m just more surprised that he had 3 pistols and managed not to shoot himself by accident.Latest consequence: no more concealed weapon permit for YOU!
N.Y.P.D. Moves to Revoke Trump’s License to Carry a Gun
Former President Donald J. Trump had a concealed carry license and had three pistols.www.nytimes.comTrump's Gun License Expected to Be Revoked by NYPD Following Criminal Conviction
Donald Trump's gun license is expected to be revoked by the New York Police Department after he was found guilty on 34 felony counts.www.rollingstone.comPost-conviction move by NYPD may ensure Trump can’t just shoot someone on 5th Avenue
Donald Trump, who once bragged he "could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone" without losing supporters, will likely be barred from owning a gun in the state he once called home.lawandcrime.com
I’m just more surprised that he had 3 pistols and managed not to shoot himself by accident.
There was an article in the Sun this morning about the AG for New York City (Bragg is his name) and how his focus on Trump is failing NYC. Interesting.Canadian media, not known for criticizing the attempts to "get Trump", are questioning the abuse of the American justice system:
Raymond J. de Souza: What the Trump verdict says about the sorry state of American justice
U.S. prosecutors can usually convict anyone of anything if they are so determinednationalpost.com
FTFYA conservative columnist writing in Canadian media, not known for criticizing the attempts to "get Trump", are questioning the abuse of the American justice system:
Raymond J. de Souza: What the Trump verdict says about the sorry state of American justice
U.S. prosecutors can usually convict anyone of anything if they are so determinednationalpost.com
Guessing it's this, no?There was an article in the Sun this morning about the AG for New York City (Bragg is his name) and how his focus on Trump is failing NYC. Interesting.
Guessing it's this, no?
Also archived here if previous link doesn't work.MCCAUGHEY: New Yorkers living in peril as district attorney focuses on Trump
A security guard at Duane Reade pharmacy and convenience store was stabbed and a shopper was threatened by a knife-wielding thiefwinnipegsun.com