- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
You kindly asked for suggestions about 'Tone and Content' and yet you didn't like what you heard in response? I loves the Internetz. This is too good. :
Punisher_6D said:You kindly asked for suggestions about 'Tone and Content' and yet you didn't like what you heard in response? I loves the Internetz. This is too good. :
Punisher_6D said:You kindly asked for suggestions about 'Tone and Content' and yet you didn't like what you heard in response? I loves the Internetz. This is too good. :
the 48th regulator said:the 48th regulator logged out, and then went to the generic mod account and locked it for his own benefit.
MatthewHopkins said:Fair enough. It's a private site and if the answer is "love it or leave it", then that is well within your collective rights. I would advise deleting this thread, though, as it asks for opinions that are unwanted and opens the door to more flame-wars.
Yrys said:Not with 2 browsers open...
Yrys said:Not with 2 browsers open...
GAP said:Why should the mods and this site adjust to someone who only wants his way? Everytime some wannabe flounces onto the site and does not like the response he gets for slamming someone, the site should change?
Uh....no, it time the disgruntled person moved on....
Mike Bobbitt said:The second trend relates to a tendency for the board to have a mean streak. In the past some of the users we have banned have accused us of a heavy hand, and in the past they were just whining. However, lately, we have seen a tendency 'the mob' to tear someone apart for what may be an innocuous error, and then the dogpile starts if they say anything in their own defence. This has manifested itself in what some may see the roving mobs circling, scrutinizing every post for weakness or naiveté or whatever. Sometimes it's spontaneous, at other times it is the mob following a perceived example set by senior members (unfortunately, there are times when this includes those of us who are DS).
the 48th regulator said:Xena,
Show me an example, please.
dileas
tess
MatthewHopkins said:This is a quote from Mike's post. He was looking to discuss ways to improve Army.ca and I took him up on it based on some things that I felt were wrong. I have messaged ArmyVern and look forward to dealing with our issue behind closed doors as there is obviously animosity remaining and it is my intention to clear that. If it is possible, it will be cleared through conversation of a respectful nature which would allow both ArmyVern and myself to set a good example of what it means to deal with things like members of a common team which is the Canadian Armed Forces.
The DS' should consider whether this thread should be locked as the goal of the thread is not being met. It has degenerated into an all-out brawl and yes, I take full responsibility for starting it. Now, I am trying to lay it to rest. One member mentioned integrity and I have enough to admit when I'm wrong and work to fix it.
Mud Recce Man said:Don't advise the DS at CFLRS on...well on anything.