- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
Canadian Sig said:More importantly add to that the fact that this soldier needs to hold a level 3 security clearance and he placed himself in a compromising position and he should lose his clearance, and as a result, his job.
Riiiight, so you would yank someone's security clearance for "attempted philandering" great. It's knee jerk reactions like that that make us look foolish as a military. A bunch of so called professionals using the system on each other to settle personal beefs is pretty corrosive to morale too, and a disturbingly large waste of time and resources.
If you have a problem with what happened, perform a quick "8 inches below the belt check", then use what you see, (there should be two of them) and go have a quick chat with the person in question. Don't you feel somewhat emasculated that you have to resort to administrative action to solve your personal problems? What happened to solving issues at the lowest level?
I'd be more concerned about "leaders" scared to death of a confrontation with one of their peers than someone else's drunken stupidity.
If you brought this "issue" to me as a supervisor, I would laugh you out of my office. You need to seperate your personal life from the military.