• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2021 - ????

That article is from over two years and two gun bans ago. I'm sure Nanaimo is much safer now.

Of course it is ;)


Nanaimo's crime severity among Canada's 10 worst, but situation improving​


Nanaimo’s crime rate has dropped, but the city's crime severity index is still in Canada’s top 10.

According to Statistics Canada data released last month, Nanaimo’s crime severity index fell two per cent in 2023 compared to 2022 and the city's crime rate overall went down nine per cent.

The crime rate, which excludes traffic offences, is based on the number of crimes per 100,000 population. Nanaimo in 2023 tallied 10,200 crimes.

Crime severity indexes are drawn from criminal code incidents reported by police departments across the country. They are meant as a representation of the seriousness of crimes committed, with violent crimes and child sex abuse cases, for example, ranking higher on the scale.

But in spite of lowered crime incident and severity figures, StatsCan still pegged Nanaimo as Canada’s sixth-worst municipality for crime severity after Kamloops, with the country's highest crime severity index of 165.3, followed by Chilliwack at 156.2; Red Deer, Alta., 146.3, and Lethbridge, Alta. and Winnipeg, which tied at 129.1. Nanaimo is followed by Kelowna with a CSI of 118.6, Regina at 111.6, Abbotsford-Mission, 107.6 and Edmonton, 105.

 
So I guess JT now wants to move thousands of immigrants out of Que and Ont too BC, Alberta, NB and NS.

The NS Premier:

Incase the link doesn't work:

Nova Scotians are caring, compassionate people, but we will not be taken advantage of by the federal government.

The reality is that our population is growing from immigration, migration and retention. Our immigration growth is strategic - focused on filling shortages in healthcare and trades. We have to stick to this focused plan, aimed to fill strategic vacancies and we ask that the federal government respect our plan.

It is simply unacceptable for the Trudeau government to try to force thousands of asylum seekers on our Province at this time. Nova Scotia simply does not have the capacity to accept thousands of asylum seekers. We cannot let the failure of federal policies derail our plan and we have communicated to Trudeau’s cabinet that any attempt to ship asylum seekers to Nova Scotia will be challenged.

We are calling on the Trudeau government to drop the idea, listen to Nova Scotians and let us focus on our strategic and sustainable plan that is attracting the professionals our province needs.

Not sue what he can do to stop it. But here is hoping the sitting Gov falls before they can do more damage to Canada.

And


With politicians like this, who needs enemies ?
 
All the interviews I have seen of Liberal MPs/Cabinet Ministers commenting during/after Nanaimo meeting, indicates that they have no clue the circumstances of the taxpayers who are their employers.
 
Interesting stats from Angus Reid ....
The who-has-moved-left-or-right-more question isn't meaningfully answered by simply asking people what they observe, because there are no independent reference points. I am confident that the perception of conservatives moving right is as wrong here as it is in the US - if you're a progressive rapidly moving left but you flatter yourself you're a centrist and you're unaware of your own velocity, it just looks like conservatives are moving right. Frame of reference matters.

The independent reference points are specific policies and issues. For example, conservatives have moved left on same-sex marriage and improved respect of rights for all persons - not all, but not none. Drill down into issues of the past few decades and mostly the same phenomenon will be observed: progressive-initiated changes are implemented with resistance from conservatives; conservatives hopefully manage to work out some of the kinks over time (there are always going to be some); but, gradually, the change is almost always accepted to some degree. Progressives and conservatives are both moving left, but at different velocities. It's the progressives who are moving with more speed.

Obviously the true "centre of mass" must move left. But after a while, we should expect the gap to widen enough that the population of true centrists is much smaller than either the mass of progressives or mass of conservatives, each clustered around some "average". We're already past that point, which is why centrism has little traction. I doubt there are any satisfactory solutions which involve one group imposing its values on the other.

[Add: rather than "left" and "right" we could just substitute "the general direction progressives want to move", and "the general direction progressives do not want to move".]
 
Back
Top