• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Need for More 360 Reviews in CAF? (split fm Trudeau Popularity)

360 reviews have their place but not in every circumstance and not in every organization.

I know some people that are weaponized assholes and are also highly effective operators who drive results. You don't have to be liked to be good.
 
360 reviews have their place but not in every circumstance and not in every organization.

I know some people that are weaponized assholes and are also highly effective operators who drive results. You don't have to be liked to be good.

This to me is the real danger of 360 reviews.

Also leaders have to make tough calls, and in our business they may have to make tough calls that are unpopular. I don't want to see our promotion system run by populism.
 
This to me is the real danger of 360 reviews.

Also leaders have to make tough calls, and in our business they may have to make tough calls that are unpopular. I don't want to see our promotion system run by populism.
It's not a popularity contest. Trust me when I say I'm probably one of the least popular people in the town I live in now. When you're the Sheriff, not everyone is going to like you.
 
I suspect there has been, since ancient times, two "classes" of soldiers: the 'warriors' (and the 'gentlemen warriors' who led them into close combat) and the "professionals." I'm sure that every Roman centurion knew, roughly, how deep and wide each layer of a road had to be, but the big roads and the aqueducts were built by trained engineers and the Romans also had specialist to operate the catapults and so on. The gunpowder age added to the "professionals" status; some Scots lords, for example, had more artillery in their private arsenals than King Henry VIII had in his entire army. Gunners, sappers and miners and other specialists were the core of the "standing army" while the bands of warriors - led by gentlemen - were called up as needed.

Many of my gunner friends who were FOOs in a combat team do not believe they played "second fiddle" to the infantry or armoured corps soldiers who marched (or rode) beside them. Ditto the sappers who want ahead to clear obstacles so that the infantry and armoured soldiers could follow.

Likewise RAF/RCAF types that volunteered for Bomber Command. What motivated them to get back into the rear turret of a Halifax for the 23rd and 24th time?

There is a difference but where and when and how ... and sometimes the difference is found in one person.

With that said... different jobs come with different risks and attract different types of people with different motivations that require managing differently.

Amateurs and professionals, volunteers and conscripts, lifers and "for the duration"...

How does the state, in service to the nation, get the most out of all those individuals and turn them into a cohesive force?

...

Some trades die faster than others and have to be replenished more often.

How quickly can skills be transferred and people made useful?

And some trades have skills that can't be easily transferred and need to be protected.

...

And then there is the role of emotion.
 
Back
Top