• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

PM Chretein did all right by us

Retired AF Guy said:
Actually, not true. If I'm peeved off at someone and I tell them I'm going to go home and get a gun and come back and kill them, I'm likely to get arrested, especially if I've had a history in the past of going home, getting a gun and killing someone.

Yes. Because that's both act and intent. That'd be quite a non sequitur.
 
Retired AF Guy said:
Actually, not true. If I'm peeved off at someone and I tell them I'm going to go home and get a gun and come back and kill them, I'm likely to get arrested, especially if I've had a history in the past of going home, getting a gun and killing someone.

Your intent would be to scare me by making the threat, and then you have the act when you actually make the threat.

I agree with your point though, it was an oversimplification. But my main point still stands. He may have had the intent of restarting his pursuit, but the sanctions were working, and he was never able to move beyond intent.
 
Prime Minister Chrétien was a very, very skilled and successful retail politician; he 'sold' Canadians what they wanted and they repaid him with their support.

He was also incredibly lucky: Lucien Bouchard and Parson Preston Manning gave him three majorities in a row; there was no way Ontario would have given the Liberals 100 seats had Reform not been (not just portrayed as) an unknown, socially conservative, prairie populist movement with few policies that appealed to the moderate middle.

I didn't like much of anything about Jean Chrétien: I thought and still think that he was, personally, dishonest and that he he used his official power to cover up acts that might have landed a less well connected man in jail; I thought and still think that while his fiscal instincts were right (balanced budget, etc) he chose a sneaky and, ultimately ineffective way of balancing the books - he offloaded the big debt producing programmes to AB, BC and ON; I thought and still think that his foreign and defence policies were based solely and exclusively on domestic political concerns; and I thought and still think that he was and still is a bully.

That being said, he wasn't a bad prime minister, about on a par, perhaps, with Abbott, Thompson and Bowell - not as bad as Trudeau, not as good as Borden or Diefenbaker. But he wasn't a monster and he was what a solid plurality of our fellow Canadians wanted - he was what they bought and they paid for him, too, with the 'northern peso'.
 
Back
Top