FJAG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 12,953
- Points
- 1,160
Well, thanks for calling my defence of a legal theory that our law has upheld as fundamental for centuries as an annoying correction of a small error or caring too much about minor details. Perhaps I prefer to see evidence properly challenged in court rather than the court of public opinion before I pronounce someone guilty of a criminal (or disciplinary) offence.
Or maybe I just don't like to slander someone's name before he has had a proper opportunity to defend himself. I'm kind of funny that way. But if you have a better way of determining what the "objective truth" is - feel free to form whatever opinion floats your boat. Personally, I don't condemn people on the basis of news reports and leaked stories.
![Clinking beer mugs :beers: 🍻](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f37b.png)
Or maybe I just don't like to slander someone's name before he has had a proper opportunity to defend himself. I'm kind of funny that way. But if you have a better way of determining what the "objective truth" is - feel free to form whatever opinion floats your boat. Personally, I don't condemn people on the basis of news reports and leaked stories.
![Clinking beer mugs :beers: 🍻](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f37b.png)
Last edited: