- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 110
Quote from George Wallace Nov, 2nd. 2005
It looks to me like you are looking for a conspiracy where there is none. Many Newspapers, especially small ones, will empty out their basements of their old copies. They try to find a Museum or Archives that will accept them. In this case, you are probably looking at this practice having been done in the past, with relevant copies being sent to DND historical archives.
**********************************************
Looking for a conspiracy, No we don't have to look anywhere for that. What would you call spraying ones own troops with deadly chemicals and then for close to 50 years and through many secretive Governments not a word leaks out and this from people who just love the lime light? Reporters dug, reported suspicions and were shot down with the "It never happened "defense. Even today when they only admitted to it when they were confronted with the documents from the USA about the 66 &67 Agent Orange sprayings but still won't admit to the spraying done from 1956 through 1984, even when we have the DND's on documentation of that very spraying. If you don't believe that this is a conspiracy of silence, well there is no pill for stupidity, enough said.
************************************
************************************
Quote from 3rd. Horseman Oct, 26th. 2005
One must remember that the substance AO and the other herbicides sprayed were legal chemicals that anyone could buy at the local hardware store and spray at home. The contention from the other thread is that it was not done on purpose that is the out of context part.
****************************************
One must also remember that bullets are legal however Canadian soldiers shouldn't expect their own Government to order them to be shot because of it. Arsenic is still legal but try feed it to your wife and just see where that lands you. No where on any label of them chemicals did it say safe for human consumption nor did it say go ahead and spray the people and on the bottles that you say was available to the general public it does say keep away from pets and wild life. I know that everything in the Army isn't safe but the troops deserved a heads up not to eat the berries, drink the water, use dead twigs to stir the food, they needed to be told not to use dried leaves to wipe their behinds and so many other things that are just taken for granted when in the field. To be warned about the dangers," We as Soldiers deserved that much." If you can't see that, well, (There is none so blind as those that will not see."
It looks to me like you are looking for a conspiracy where there is none. Many Newspapers, especially small ones, will empty out their basements of their old copies. They try to find a Museum or Archives that will accept them. In this case, you are probably looking at this practice having been done in the past, with relevant copies being sent to DND historical archives.
**********************************************
Looking for a conspiracy, No we don't have to look anywhere for that. What would you call spraying ones own troops with deadly chemicals and then for close to 50 years and through many secretive Governments not a word leaks out and this from people who just love the lime light? Reporters dug, reported suspicions and were shot down with the "It never happened "defense. Even today when they only admitted to it when they were confronted with the documents from the USA about the 66 &67 Agent Orange sprayings but still won't admit to the spraying done from 1956 through 1984, even when we have the DND's on documentation of that very spraying. If you don't believe that this is a conspiracy of silence, well there is no pill for stupidity, enough said.
************************************
************************************
Quote from 3rd. Horseman Oct, 26th. 2005
One must remember that the substance AO and the other herbicides sprayed were legal chemicals that anyone could buy at the local hardware store and spray at home. The contention from the other thread is that it was not done on purpose that is the out of context part.
****************************************
One must also remember that bullets are legal however Canadian soldiers shouldn't expect their own Government to order them to be shot because of it. Arsenic is still legal but try feed it to your wife and just see where that lands you. No where on any label of them chemicals did it say safe for human consumption nor did it say go ahead and spray the people and on the bottles that you say was available to the general public it does say keep away from pets and wild life. I know that everything in the Army isn't safe but the troops deserved a heads up not to eat the berries, drink the water, use dead twigs to stir the food, they needed to be told not to use dried leaves to wipe their behinds and so many other things that are just taken for granted when in the field. To be warned about the dangers," We as Soldiers deserved that much." If you can't see that, well, (There is none so blind as those that will not see."