pointfiveoh said:
Sorry, I should of used the quote feature.
"Should have".
Also sorry - inner English teacher and picky staff guy.
pointfiveoh said:
That said, since were all here, was I fairly accurate (if not, where'd I miss) above? Just want to know for knowings sake, haha.
As you asked:
pointfiveoh said:
And even if you were, you would not be qualified to give such advice. Somebody with recent experience making decisions regarding an applicant's mental fitness would be qualified, but would not likely do so without seeing the whole file, and would certainly not do so on an open forum.
pointfiveoh said:
The absence of hospitalizations, ongoing/recurring failed treatments, "NCR" convictions, use of anti-psychotics or mood stabilizers etc..., will certainly make your case seem less serious.
"May" is a more valid claim. "May not" is also equally valid. Who knows?
Neither me, nor you, nor anybody else here.
pointfiveoh said:
There's a big push about talking about mental health concerns, even with relation to the military, so if you did just that and got help it shows you knew when you need it, and never let the situation reach a level where it could become fatal.
You fail to recognize the nature of the situations and environments into which we put people, and the effects of those situations and environments. Getting help may well be impossible. How would somebody "never let the situation reach a level where it could become fatal"? Many have not been successful with that, either during or after their tours. I have met at least one member of this Site, for the first time, at a mutual friend and colleague's repat and funeral and I do not wish to do that again. This is serious stuff. Really.
pointfiveoh said:
Some people get heat rashes, you go to the doctor, you get cream, it goes away.
Rashes can get pretty serious in austere environments. Mental issues can become fatal. There is no brain cream to make them go away.
pointfiveoh said:
a letter of employment related reference can show youve been able to work without any serious mental health implications.
"Able to work without any serious mental health implications" in an austere location where people are being killed and horribly mutilated? Including one's friends? Where no treatment or "normal" outlet is available? When food and living conditions suck, and adequate hygiene and rest are sorely lacking? What civilian employment can compare to that?
pointfiveoh said:
from what I've learned working in the field I'm in now, this is what I know.
Indubitably, but that's not
this field.
pointfiveoh said:
a letter of employment related reference can show youve been able to work without any serious mental health implications.
Again, what civilian employment can compare?
pointfiveoh said:
Another example, if you disclosed to your doctor feelings of depression over a particular incident, this may not affect you, but an active diagnosis of a "depressive disorder" likely would. If you are on medications, it may also affect you, depending what they are and if it's possible for you to function without them. It seems, though, that the best route would be to obtain a letter from your doctor clearing you of any MH diagnosis, and if possible, stating that they believe you are fit for service.
This is a little better, but requiring medications is a disqualifier.
We have a duty to care for our members and, to a lesser degree, applicants. This includes keeping applicants out, if there is a possibility that they could harm themselves at some point. Part of that is due to responsibility for them as individuals, and the greater part is for the others who could be placed in jeopardy because a colleague suffering from depression or something else, controllable or not in a "normal" civilian environment, kills him/herself or becomes ineffective in a life-or-death situation.
We'd not likely recruit somebody who's had a heart attack, either. A civilian company may well hire that person, but we could not, as a problem has been demonstrated.