Glad you find it funny. I don't remember it that wayNot dogpiling. Trying to follow your train of thought.
I would never mistake you for a child unless you were out picking tomatoes or detassilling corn but I’d likely have to look twice.
Easy. Just trying to de-escalate. If I offended you I apologize.Glad you find it funny. I don't remember it that way
Don't worry about it. I've just gotten into a crusty mood in the last hour.
And that’s completely fair and valid. I’ve got nothing but respect for anyone supporting family who are in a bind; I’m doing that too though from a more advantageous position. I’m just worried at seeing a push for policies - knowing that that push is in no way with a benevolent intent - that’s probably gonna contribute to trapping a new generation of kids into intergenerational poverty.
Feature, not bug. As pointed out up thread- the donors need a serf class to prop up the system.
It may be this:
www.independent.co.uk
Not worth worrying about. If people want to fight over the delivery mechanism rather than the content, let them waste their time.
Information control is what governments attempt when they feel like they're losing the information contest. Almost nothing has changed since furious kings raged impotently against pamphleteers publishing abroad. One thing that has changed: people used to recognize and reject such illiberalism when they saw it.
I say ineffectively because X's CEO Linda Yaccarino wrote them back basically telling them to pound salt. Elon was a tad more explicit.
www.ft.com
While the action was wrong on a lot of levels and screams for accountability, when the linked article frames the story as "Kamala Harris' Secret Service", it paints those involved as agents of her and doing her bidding.That has nothing to do with addressing the root problem though. There was an Agent in Charge, then there were those agents that carried out the orders without question. That is a fundamental breakdown in the private citizens civil rights by the government and agency that is supposed to protect those rights. You don't throw money at something like this to make it go away. You publicly address the problem and show the citizens that this stuff won't be tolerated. Paying someone off with their own taxes doesn't cut it.
Edit - it is contrary to the third amendment Third Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia Also, under Massachusetts law the people involved can be arrested for trespass and possibly break and enter.
Breaking and Entering by Kamala Harris' Secret Service: Why Aren’t They Held Accountable?
The recent actions of the Secret Service at a Massachusetts salon during Vice President Kamala Harris’s fundraiser have sparked outrage and demand for accountability. This event is not just an “incident”; it constitutes breaking and entering—a serious criminal offense. Amidst the heightened...www.rfsafe.com
I believe Musk made the offer to Harris during this interview, not FOR this interview. I’d be curious if he actually made an official offer. But after the disaster this one was, and his previous creations about Harris on X, there wouldn’t be much to gain by sitting down with a Trump mega donor.
Right now it looks like the Harris campaign doesn't think there's much to gain by sitting Harris or Walz down with anyone for an unscripted chat. The response from the Democrat-supporting media is mostly "Oh, OK." (These are the same media who have argued how Vital To Democracy their profession is, and thus deserving of some kinds of protection from the economic disruptions afflicting them, because of how they force politicians to answer to voters.)
Right now it seems so. If they keep their polling on an upward trajectory, no need to change that. As with Trump,though, I am sure that will change as required,
Sure. Whatever. I'm not doing this again. Believe what you want. It was a well known US judge that explained the 3rd amendment linkage. But if you know better about the US Constitution than Judge Napolitano feel free to argue with him.
How casually the investigative function of the press and the importance of politicians demonstrating competence at thinking on their feet were brushed aside.
