- Reaction score
- 2,540
- Points
- 1,190
All for a ‘modern’ navy. From the sounds of it, all that isn’t working out too well.
Life in the navy was hard, but it was fun and full Of adventure.
Now it's a lot harder, and a lot less fun.
All for a ‘modern’ navy. From the sounds of it, all that isn’t working out too well.
I agree most people didn’t drink at sea, we were all pretty responsible in regards to it. It did have a significant effect on us drinking in foreign ports and parties on the ship as it significantly changed the prices from a dollar a shot or beer to whatever it is now.
The same time they did it they chose to restrict us all to two drinks a day in foreign port, which I hope has been removed.
It might not be important to you, but to many of us it was. Considering it wasn’t being abused and we weren’t having issues related to it, it was a political statement disguised as being something good for us. I put my release in from the Navy a week after that decision, no regrets on that part and one of the best decisions of my life.
That meeting in the hanger is one I will never forget, I have never heard a group of two hundred people so silent, you could physically feel the anger.
All for a ‘modern’ navy. From the sounds of it, all that isn’t working out too well.
Knocking off drinking at sea was the smartest thing the RCN ever did. Bar is still open when you're alongside during bar hours, which is completely fine as well.Lots of people were also cheering on the sidelines as that man had a strong hand in killing naval tradition (taking drinking off the ships) and was also one of those who if sailing in the modern fleet would have been responsible for many releases.
Pretty damning indictment if THAT is what tops it all.Knocking off drinking at sea was the smartest thing the RCN ever did.
Pretty damning that we were alcoholics and problem drinkers for so long and ignored it (or encouraged that behaviour at least). Used to be the best officer was the one who could drink super hard and still do their watch super hungover the next day. Because that's what sailors did. Same thing for everyone else onboard. Drinking in engineering spaces, beer machine etc...Pretty damning indictment if THAT is what tops it all.
Not very safe nor professional.
So my C&P is part of the tradition?? LolBut I thought that was all part of the 'tradition' thing?
So my C&P is part of the tradition?? Lol
But I thought that was all part of the 'tradition' thing?
Still got the job done safely and effectively. Can’t say the same for the modern excuse of a fleet.Pretty damning that we were alcoholics and problem drinkers for so long and ignored it (or encouraged that behaviour at least). Used to be the best officer was the one who could drink super hard and still do their watch super hungover the next day. Because that's what sailors did. Same thing for everyone else onboard. Drinking in engineering spaces, beer machine etc...
Not very safe nor professional.
Given how easy it was to sweep "mistakes" under the rug back then compared to now (and I'm saying this, fully understanding it's still easy to sweep issues under the rug), I'm willing to bet that the job wasn't done as safely/effectively as people thought.Still got the job done safely and effectively.
I dunno, launching and recovering the whaler was a very dangerous operation. There was a plethora of points in the evolution that EVERYTHING could go south and people would die.I'm willing to bet that the job wasn't done as safely/effectively as people thought
Sure, but I'm suggesting that @Eaglelord17 may have been viewing the "good old days" with rose-coloured glasses.I dunno, launching and recovering the whaler was a very dangerous operation. There was a plethora of points in the evolution that EVERYTHING could go south and people would die.
Yeah, that's not on - especially if there happens to be an emergency. You don't want a bunch of drunk folks trying (and likely failing) to do Damage ControlBut yes, the booze was an issue, in Fraser we had a CC that couldn’t function until he put down a mickey of whiskey. The poor clerks in his office were likely alcoholics just from booze emanating from his pores!
Some ship’s Department’s were run by killicks and Master Killicks because the PO’s were hammered in 3 Mess.
Given that many (most?) folks are on a watch system and you need to be 8 hours post-drinking to work, how many people would that really apply to at sea?But banning booze at sea hasn’t solved the alcohol/ drug abuse ashore.
Just the day workers. In the wardroom the SYO and EO would have a glass of wine at supper. Also those stories are from the days prior to the new frigates and I saw a huge change of attitudes when we had ships with modern capabilities.Given that many (most?) folks are on a watch system and you need to be 8 hours post-drinking to work, how many people would that really apply to at sea?
To be fair, I find Met not to be too useful when operating in locations where there is a well establish commercial (or US military) Met presence that can be accessed. As aircrew, we are trained to interpret weather products - probably not to the same level as a met tech - but certainly good enough for what we need to do and decide what we need to do operationally (alternate airports, routes, etc). In those cases, I would much rather take 5 mins to read the readily available weather products and shape my plan than sit through a 15 min weather brief that may of may not give me what I need and then sit down and re-read the weather to make my plan.100% I'm glad to hear it from the users, because fighting that has been a losing battle from the inside.
That said, the RCAF abandoned us before the JMC was a thing. The entire reason the JMC happened is because the RCAF decided somewhere between the air crews and 1 CAD that a website was better than a SME.
Like I've said before on here, I've had aircrew walk past my staffed briefing desk at 4 am(when my staff had come in specifically to brief) because they checked Nav Canada before coming to work.
Nothing makes your 18 years of training and experience feel more worthwhile than a crew looking in, seeing you there ready to brief, then walking past as if you don't exist.
#windyftwTo be fair, I find Met not to be too useful when operating in locations where there is a well establish commercial (or US military) Met presence that can be accessed. As aircrew, we are trained to interpret weather products - probably not to the same level as a met tech - but certainly good enough for what we need to do and decide what we need to do operationally (alternate airports, routes, etc). In those cases, I would much rather take 5 mins to read the readily available weather products and shape my plan than sit through a 15 min weather brief that may of may not give me what I need and then sit down and re-read the weather to make my plan.
Where Met is really useful is when we operate at or above locations where those products do NOT exist.
Just the day workers. In the wardroom the SYO and EO would have a glass of wine at supper. Also those stories are from the days prior to the new frigates and I saw a huge change of attitudes when we had ships with modern capabilities.
I guess my issue is that I’m an adult, I can control myself, and I don’t need bannings to control things. We have rules, enforce the bloody things, and hammer the offenders.
2009 with... Cdr Graham as CO?If people had proven to be able to control themselves and stick to the glass of wine with dinner then I don't think it would be an issue.
But I also remember getting woken at night as the duty storesman to write an IOR and finding my PO2 in the stores office passed out drunk and pouring beer all over the deck. I had to go wake my MS and we had to quietly get him to his rack.
That was on anti piracy patrols when TOR circumnavigated Africa. He would have been in no shape to contribute to the ship if something went down.
2009 with... Cdr Graham as CO?