• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Wreck of HMS Investigator found; fundamental to Canada Arctic claims?

CougarKing

Army.ca Fixture
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
360
Canadians discover long-lost ship ‘fundamental’ to Arctic sovereignty
The wreckage of HMS Investigator was detected within days of Parks Canada launching its ambitious search for the 36-metre ship in Mercy Bay, N.W.T.
Don Martin, National Post · Wednesday, Jul. 28, 2010

MERCY BAY, N.W.T. • The ship whose crew discovered Canada’s Northwest Passage has been found 155 years after it was abandoned and disappeared in this isolated Arctic bay, a historic find and one that may help bolster Canadian claims to Arctic sovereignty.

The wreck of HMS Investigator was detected in shallow water within days of Parks Canada archeologists launching an ambitious search for the 422-ton ship from a chilly tent encampment on the Beaufort Sea shoreline.

“It’s sitting upright in silt; the three masts have been removed, probably by ice,” said Ifan Thomas, Parks Canada’s superintendent of the western Arctic Field Unit. “It’s a largely intact ship in very cold water, so deterioration didn’t happen very quickly.”

Environment Minister Jim Prentice, who arrived at the camp on Tuesday, said that finding a relic linked to the discovery of the Northwest Passage represents a reasserted Canadian claim to Arctic sovereignty
.

“It’s fundamental to Canadian sovereignty in the North,” he said in an interview.

“[A]nd the tragic tale of Investigator is one of the most amazing stories of Arctic history. It’s a tale of incredible determination and suffering,” Mr. Prentice said.

The three-masted, copper-bottomed Investigator was found this week after marine archeologists deployed side-scan sonars from inflatable Zodiac boats. Underwater cameras will be used this week to photograph the wreck and divers will be deployed next summer to probe the hull.

The clear Arctic water makes it possible to glimpse the outline of the ship’s outer deck, which is only eight metres below the surface.

Three graves were also found on Tuesday. They are undoubtedly the remains of a trio of British sailors who succumbed to disease in the final months of this ship’s three-year Arctic ordeal.

“In anthropological terms, this is the most important shipwreck in history,” said senior marine archeologist, Ryan Harris. “This was the first contact with the Copper Inuit; it’s a bit like finding a Columbus ship in the Arctic.”

The remains of the 36-metre ship were discovered at the approximate spot 150 metres off shore where it was last visited in 1854 by a passing British expedition.

When master seaman Frederick Krabbe boarded the vessel, it was tilting on its side and half-filled with ice. Aboriginal history records that the Investigator had vanished by the following summer.

Whether the ship had drifted into deep water or out of Mercy Bay altogether had been a source of constant speculation for more than a hundred years.

Solving that mystery — thanks in part to changes in climate, since the first recorded year Mercy Bay was ice-free was the summer of 2007 — puts an ending to one of the Arctic’s greatest marine dramas.

Investigator had sailed from England in 1850 under Captain Robert McClure to join the frantic search for the ill-fated Franklin expedition, entering the Arctic from the western side in hopes of finding Franklin’s two ships emerging from the fabled passage.

But while Investigator probed further east than any other European expedition, the ship quickly became trapped in ice, often hoisted out of the water by 15-metre-high ice ridges or threatened with hull-crushing floes.

The 69-member crew first attempted a route along the southern shore of Bank Island before retreating to head north into what is now McClure Strait in the summer of 1851.

Running into impenetrable pack ice, they sought shelter in this treeless, windswept bay and spent another two winters locked in ice.

With no sign of a thaw and his sailors debilitated by scurvy or weakened by starvation as rations dwindled, Capt. McClure ordered the ship’s crew divided into three parties, two leaving on suicidal attempts to walk to safety while the third would stay aboard in hopes of sailing free later in the year.

But within weeks of his desperate survival plan being implemented, another ship’s officer miraculously appeared on the horizon with word two better-equipped British vessels were also trapped in ice at neighbouring Melville Island.

Capt. McClure gave the order to abandon ship. The crew cleaned the cabins, emptied supplies into a massive cache on the shore, hoisted the Red Ensign and set out for the HMS Resolute where, after spending a fourth winter trapped in ice, they abandoned that ship and set sail to England aboard the HMS Northern Star.

While the captain and his crew walked part of the passage and left their ship behind, British MPs still voted to give Capt. McClure the posted reward of 10,000 British pounds for discovering the Northwest Passage.


Parks Canada had spent months planning the high Arctic search for Investigator, complicated by the logistics of reaching a remote, uninhabited location a four-hour flight northeast of Inuvik. The National Post and Calgary Herald joined the expedition on Tuesday along with a CPAC television network crew.

They will join Mr. Prentice and archeologists for the next three days, exploring the wind-scrubbed northern shoreline of Aulavik National Park, where polar bears roam and the muskoxen population has exploded. A bear fence encircles the camp.

But the payoff from the discovery was worth the complicated effort, said Mr. Prentice, who has been dreaming about finding the wreck since he wrote a book review for a diplomatic magazine of B.C. author Bryan Payton’s acclaimed account of the Investigator’s fate, The Ice Passage.

“This is one of the most important shipwrecks in Canadian history because Investigator carried Capt. Robert McClure, who discovered the western entrance to the Northwest Passage,” Mr. Prentice said after he was informed of the discovery.

“I’m elated,” he said. “It’s a special moment linking our past and future in the Canadian Arctic. It was the first contact between Arctic people and European explorers and it couples high tech with the oral history of the Inuit people.”

The expedition will not stop with the wreck’s discovery. Electronic scanners will be deployed on land to search for buried artifacts and graves this week.

While the giant cache of supplies taken off the ship has been largely removed over the decades, other areas around the Investigator’s final resting place will be searched for archeological remains.

Parks Canada is prevented by law from exhuming the remains found on Tuesday, but it’s possible British authorities may remove the bodies for a burial in England.

Large amounts of copper and other metal from the Investigator found their way into Inuit culture, Mr. Prentice noted. Copper siding from the ship was apparently used so extensively that in some cultures, they became known as the Copper Inuit.

The year of banner discovery may not be over for Parks Canada archeologists. With sea ice at record low levels, they will set sail in August to search for the Franklin expedition’s two ships, the Erebus and the Terror.

National Post



Read more: National Post link



 
 
so how does this discovery do anything for Canadian Sovereignty in the Arctic ? as in the headline and subhead
 
AJFitzpatrick said:
so how does this discovery do anything for Canadian Sovereignty in the Arctic ? as in the headline and subhead
Stacked said:
Because it proves it was discovered by the British? My guess....

Close, but no cigar!

Its because later, the British crown turned all of its Arctic territory over to the newly created Dominion of Canada: Ergo: The NW passage was British and then became part of Canada.
 
Arctic sovereignty is simply a political catchword.  There is no question of our jurisdiction over the landmasses.  Our jusisdiction over seas is subject to international agreement and law which has been created over the last hundreds of years.  The puffing, snorting, and sticking out of our chests is more or less irrelevant.  No other country in the world is going to accept our definition of a maritime passage as not to include the Northwest Passage.  Seriously, what's in it for them?
 
This is what I don't understand and I don't know why no one jumps on the bandwagon about this...

The Inuit have lived in the arctic for what? Thousands of years? It's where they lived, they worked, they ate, they travelled... where they EXISTED for thousands of years. There's no doubt that they could easily claim this as their own. 

If Canada wants to 100% bind this arctic lands and space into Canadian territory so that no other country can lay claim to it, all they need to do is make a treaty (one that is fair) to the indigenous peoples of the arctic in which the inuit (and other arctic peoples, there are more than just the one group)... those treaties are held by international law and respected.

That being said, the United Nations will only fully support this type of dealing 100% if the Canadian government will sign the declaration of rights for indigenous peoples in which the above last paragraph, would pertain to. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html Currently, there are only two governments in the world which refuse to sign this declaration out of the original four hold-outs. Two of the four have recently signed on (New Zealand and Australia) leaving only two left. Canada and the United States.

One has to remember that International law and the United Nations are two, separate entities....
 
armychick2009 said:
This is what I don't understand and I don't know why no one jumps on the bandwagon about this...

The Inuit have lived in the arctic for what? Thousands of years? It's where they lived, they worked, they ate, they travelled... where they EXISTED for thousands of years. There's no doubt that they could easily claim this as their own. 

If Canada wants to 100% bind this arctic lands and space into Canadian territory so that no other country can lay claim to it, all they need to do is make a treaty (one that is fair) to the indigenous peoples of the arctic in which the inuit (and other arctic peoples, there are more than just the one group)... those treaties are held by international law and respected.

That being said, the United Nations will only fully support this type of dealing 100% if the Canadian government will sign the declaration of rights for indigenous peoples in which the above last paragraph, would pertain to. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html Currently, there are only two governments in the world which refuse to sign this declaration out of the original four hold-outs. Two of the four have recently signed on (New Zealand and Australia) leaving only two left. Canada and the United States.

One has to remember that International law and the United Nations are two, separate entities....

???

Your logic escapes me.  How does Canada making a Treaty with one of its indigenous peoples have any effect on International Affairs?  I am sure that all current Treaties with Canada's indigenous peoples have had absolutely no relevance on any of Canada's Foreign and International Affairs/Treaties/Disputes.  This makes no sense.
 
Hi George,

The indigenous people of the north do not have any signed treaties with the Canadian government. There has never really been anything up there that the government required so no 'trade-offs' were required (which essentially is what a treaty is).... oil, diamonds and passage were never really an issue until now.

Right now, there are other countries who are claiming ownership of the arctic/northwest passage, correct? They base this on previous expeditions of 'discovering' lands or passages and that is why the finding of this ship dating back to the date it is, is significant. It shows however, that Canadians (or, the Brits at that point, which later transferred ownership of business affairs to the government of Canada) were up there prior to other countries (ie, the US, the Russians or any other country who is claiming ownership of this area).

Internationally, "nations" can only gain lawful recognition when another country validates the legitimacy of a government and this is often done through treaties. For example, the Soviet Union signed an agreement with Germany called the Brest-Litvosk treaty after Russia collapsed. Germany validated the Soviet's legitimacy by signing the agreement (which stated a switch of lands in Poland... half to Germany, half to Soviets and a promise to not attack the Soviets for a certain amount of years). Another example is when Pierre Trudeau acknowledged China (a big kerfuffle because the US wanted to be the first to recognise them)... some of you will remember that Trudeau was a bit of an instigator but through his acknowledgement of China as a nation, it gained legitimacy on the world stage.

Now, what does this have to do with our "arctic sovereignty"? Yes, Canada claims it is Canadian territory, correct? But, if you want to 100% ensure it is viewed on the world stage as Canadian Territory, then you should have the backing of the indigenous peoples (who have been a nation) and who have been there for thousands of years. Sign a treaty, it becomes a recognized legal agreement. If you want international nations to have absolutely NO refuting of the land, then you need to have the original peoples of the land give 100% treaty access to it.  Essentially, it'd be an extra layer of a Cover Your A** tactic for the Canadian government.  So, while that ship may validate our Canadian access back 150 years (or whatever it was), this treaty would validate our Canadian access for thousands of years backed by the Inuits proven heritage of the site. 

No foreign nation could dispute our claim to the territory then, with the Canadian recognition of the Inuit as a nation by signing a treaty. Treaties are normally conducted only between two nations... hense the change from the Canadian usage of "Indian Bands" from the 70's to the current usage of First Nations... which was done to ensure legitimacy and international recognition of treaties signed within the geographic areas of Canada.
 
Nobody is claiming any of our Arctic other than one tiny  island disputed with Greenland.  Perhaps we should remind Denmark, which conducts Greenland's foreign ralations, that if it wasn't for us they'd still be kissing Nazi butt.  What all countries claim is the right to sail through the Northwest Passage unhindered, the same right our ships have to sail though every other passage in the world.

We have treaties covering the entire Arctic, the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement of 1993 and the Inuvialuit Treaty of 1984.
 
armychick2009 said:
Hi George,

The indigenous people of the north do...

Do you want to create a whole set of other problems (I smell "Activist" here)?  Perhaps you are trying to insinuate that some other nation, say Jamaica, could make a "Treaty" with the Inu and then lay claim to the Northwest Passage?  No one here would take that insinuation seriously.
 
No, I'm not an activist! I'm just trying to solidify the country of Canada's claim to the north.  The more "proof" you have to a claim of any kind, in any course, only solidifies the basis of a statement.

Dennis, I guess I meant that the Inuit are not treated in the same way that Status Natives are, covered by individual treaties of the area.  I looked at the two claims area -- are they covering the lands (and waters) in question?
 
Back
Top