Not just nasty…shoddy.Man that is some nasty journalism. I don't know about you but I found the head of the union speaking out against building warships makes me wonder who they are really working for.
Not just nasty…shoddy.Man that is some nasty journalism. I don't know about you but I found the head of the union speaking out against building warships makes me wonder who they are really working for.
I'm not some Irving shill but hot damn, I don't think I've seen such a spiteful and poorly reasoned article in sometime.Man that is some nasty journalism. I don't know about you but I found the head of the union speaking out against building warships makes me wonder who they are really working for.
From what I can see, the young writer, described as a poet, may still be a student and apparently has not gone to a journalism school. She seems to be expressing a viewpoint without having done much investigating. I blame the publication for accepting her work more than I do her for having submitted it.I'm not some Irving shill but hot damn, I don't think I've seen such a spiteful and poorly reasoned article in sometime.
If you're in a good mood and feel like that needs to be changed.
Have a read:
![]()
The Irving empire just landed an $8B payday—for warships no one asked for ⋆ The Breach
The deal was quietly announced on Trudeau’s last weekend in officebreachmedia.ca
At those prices….”River of Dreams”. I’m a Billy Joel fan.So what rivers are y'all looking at?
HMCS Downeaaster Alexa?At those prices….”River of Dreams”. I’m a Billy Joel fan.
Sadly, that's what a lot of what passes for journalism these. She has a viewpoint and therefor it is of equal value to any other, regardless of merit.From what I can see, the young writer, described as a poet, may still be a student and apparently has not gone to a journalism school. She seems to be expressing a viewpoint without having done much investigating. I blame the publication for accepting her work more than I do her for having submitted it.
I had flashbacks to defence coverage in the 80’s. The defence news always had opinion from “the other side” from the “peace movement”…I mean Soviet useful idiot organizations. It was verbatim what was spouted in that article, but somewhat smarter. They were coached by the KGB after all.Sadly, that's what a lot of what passes for journalism these. She has a viewpoint and therefor it is of equal value to any other, regardless of merit.
No need to invoke a foreign entity. It's probably a credit course at many Canadian universities.I had flashbacks to defence coverage in the 80’s. The defence news always had opinion from “the other side” from the “peace movement”…I mean Soviet useful idiot organizations. It was verbatim what was spouted in that article, but somewhat smarter. They were coached by the KGB after all.
Not but construction is well underway.Is the stone frigate testing station for the sensor setup, up and running yet?
Still clearing the ground.Is the stone frigate testing station for the sensor setup, up and running yet?
Hartlen point has nothing to do with testing superstructure module designs.Kind of worrisome, as that does not give them much time for testing prior to having to start locking down the superstructure module designs
Well you better tell the government, because they sure believe itHartlen point has nothing to do with testing superstructure module designs.
The building will have a standard superstructure for a Spy 7 array. As the article suggests each ship will have modules tested and calibrated at the facility before installation into the ship, cuts down on installation, testing and calibration among other things the facility will achieve. Nothing to do with locking down designs as you suggest unless you mean something else.Well you better tell the government, because they sure believe it