Still the Rem 870P. Did the RCN replace the 870 with a different shotgun or just move to C8/C7?
Shotguns are a very niche firearm for LE or MIL usage, as virtually anything they do can be better done by other systems.We moved to C8s with a Sig sidearm.
I think AOPs might carry a shotgun for polar bear defence, but I haven't seen their MAST (Mobile Account Ships Tables).
We also ditched our MP5s. I was sad to see them go, I loved that weapon.
It's also relatively low-footprint.C/UAS, for 99.99% of shooters, a Semi-Auto Shotgun is going to be the better option, given that most users are not internationally ranked skeet shooters - and shotgun training in the mil is a low focus effort.
Shotguns are a very niche firearm for LE or MIL usage, as virtually anything they do can be better done by other systems.
Neither Slug nor BuckShot are optimal options, as rifle caliber carbines from 5.56mm to 7.62mm NATO provide much better options in terms of precision and penetration, with a common manual of arms.
Less Lethal is one of the areas where the 12ga shines, as so many LE entities have lots of them, and so they are a economical option.
Most of those LL aspects can be done in 40mm for the Military, but it is not a good idea to mix a Lethal System with LL rounds -- one of the reason most LE LL Shotguns are painted specific colors to ensure the user is aware it is a LL system - and no lethal ammo is inserted.
C/UAS, for 99.99% of shooters, a Semi-Auto Shotgun is going to be the better option, given that most users are not internationally ranked skeet shooters - and shotgun training in the mil is a low focus effort.
In the ideal would it would be a C8 like shotgun (Hey Colt Canada make it so) loading from a magazine or drum using the same manual of arms as the C8/C7 series.
While I like the MP-5, it wasn't the easiest system to adapt between the C8 and MP-5, as the charging handle was oddly placed (compared to the C8), the lack of a bolt hold open on empty magazine, and the awkwardness of adding accessories. Plus 9mm kind of faded out when one needed to start considering shots beyond 150m, or targets that may be lightly armored..
A friend of my dad's had some interesting firearms - including a bolt action 12g back in the day...he taught me how to shoot.Recently I have developed a weird fascination for bolt action shot guns.
There is something about their simplicity. And I have always preferred wood and metal.
I’d like to add:So to shift gears a little bit, time for a CA small arm summary.
C14 replaced C3A1
C19 replaced SMLE
C20 DMR capability introduced
C22 replaced Browning Hi-Power
C6 upgraded to C6A1
CMAR replacing C7A2 and C8A3
EAGLE replacing M203A1
Last men standing in terms of old as shit weapons will be the CG84 and the C9. Have there been any programs looked at to replace either in Army service?
I imagine CANSOF already has?
Eryx replaced by nothing. It was a wet bag of poo any way, but…
M2 CarlG was replaced (at least in the LIB’s) ages ago by the M3, it should easily be replaced by the M4.
I’m not an NLAW fan whatsoever.
As much as I am a Javelin fan, I see it as complementary to the M4 CarlG, as there are applications that each excel at that the other does not.
I am not in any way an expert in any of these systems, but based on my experience in systems/fields I am an expert in, I think iterative is the best approach.If I am remembering correctly there is an intent to replace the M3 84mm.
However I seem to recall that it’s approaching the problem not from an iterative upgrade, ie. buying the M4 with the Aimpoint FCS and modern ammo natures.
Instead it’s coming at it from a SRAAW Heavy perspective. It’s conceivable that the 84 might get replaced by something like NLAW.
I think that would be a mistake. The 84 is a highly effective and cost efficient weapon for a lot of tasks that needs to be complemented by a dedicated SRAAW Heavy not replaced by such.