- Reaction score
- 1,596
- Points
- 1,060
the language thing isnt specific to the workplace. But how often do people go around calling others he,she,they etc..
P.S. The marriage thing would not be problem if all provinces adopted the firmly anti-sexism/equality rule that Quebec uses: Women keep their family names in marriage - period, no choice. It would save on the name tag budget too.
Fine until their kids with double barrelled names hook up with other double barrelled names and want to continue the practice. Like some friends years ago in Ottawa (they lived across the river at the time) who we referred to as PC (Papineau-Couture) and TC (Tremblay-Charbonneau). Fit that on a name tag.
The language issue here, that is to say the co-opting of language and compelling it's new use on others, is what initially propelled Jordan Peterson to infamy.
The irony here is that Jordan Peterson is a laurentian (McGill) educated Professor Emeritus from the University of Toronto, whose rise to prominence was fueled by escaping the need to back his work with science and academic rigour by choosing to monetize his feelings backed by charisma and rhetoric.Ironic that the woke toronto liberal university crowd tried to cancel HIM, but instead they created the thing they fear the most - logical reasoning backed by science, not feelings and fairy tails. Send your kids to trade schools folks.
Sure, you are entirely correct.Lol the bolded.... doesn't read like you think it does.
That term is unnecessarily limiting to a narrow section of identifiable people. In the spirit of inclusivity you may wish to consider a different term. For next time.The irony here is that Jordan Peterson is a laurentian (McGill) educated Professor Emeritus from the University of Toronto, whose rise to prominence was fueled by escaping the need to back his work with science and academic rigour by choosing to monetize his feelings backed by charisma and rhetoric.
He's like Malcom Gladwell. Insightful and talented author. Brilliant orator. But not the intellectual titans with definitive opinions fanboys make them out to be.
Fine until their kids with double barrelled names hook up with other double barrelled names and want to continue the practice. Like some friends years ago in Ottawa (they lived across the river at the time) who we referred to as PC (Papineau-Couture) and TC (Tremblay-Charbonneau). Fit that on a name tag.
He's like Malcom Gladwell. Insightful and talented author. Brilliant orator. But not the intellectual titans with definitive opinions fanboys make them out to be.
He is far more fact based than the people that try to oppose him. So they need to undermine his credibility.The irony here is that Jordan Peterson is a laurentian (McGill) educated Professor Emeritus from the University of Toronto, whose rise to prominence was fueled by escaping the need to back his work with science and academic rigour by choosing to monetize his feelings backed by charisma and rhetoric.
He's like Malcom Gladwell. Insightful and talented author. Brilliant orator. But not the intellectual titans with definitive opinions fanboys make them out to be.
The law specifies that no more than two names can be used. The real problem is not that you can then have 16 possibilities with the second generation, but that the law allows that each child in the same family can have a different last name.
Many family law specialists in Quebec argued (correctly in my opinion) that once a family name has been selected for the first child, then it should be the only one possible for all the other children of the same couple.
P.S. The worst I have seen is a poor Sea Cadet in Sherbrooke whose family name was Deslauriers-Delongchamps. He got the only two lines name tag I have ever seen and got the ribbing that came with it, as you can well imagine.
He is far more fact based than the people that try to oppose him. So they need to undermine his credibility.
They're female so I was fine with it. On the same note I'm happy to refer to them as he.As for the sleepover thing, did you acquiesce on principle or on parts?
It's a nuance but I'm going to say I have a right to my beliefs, period. There's no until.You have a right to your beliefs until
That's an easy fix. Tell your chain of command that forcing members to identify their pronouns in their signature block is non-binaryphobic and non-conformingphobic. It's the same as ordering a transmale to use she/her pronouns.this nonsense is already mandated in our email signatures.
You could even take it a step further and suggest everyone using pronouns in their signature block is a passive-aggressive attack on non-binary people and creates a non-inclusive and toxic workspace for them.
He has never stuck me as one that believes he is theMost of his arguments are an application of a blend of philosophy and psychology to other matters- law, science, etc.
Calling a philosopher more "fact based" is like arguing blue bikes are better because they're faster. It's neither provable nor relevant to the field.
See the last sentence of the quoted post. He's not right, he's not wrong. He never should have been "cancelled", nor he some infallible arbiter of truth.
He has never said he was a "infallible arbiter of truth" Some people treat that way, but that is not his fault, when he clearly that title was held by his wifeMost of his arguments are an application of a blend of philosophy and psychology to other matters- law, science, etc.
Calling a philosopher more "fact based" is like arguing blue bikes are better because they're faster. It's neither provable nor relevant to the field.
See the last sentence of the quoted post. He's not right, he's not wrong. He never should have been "cancelled", nor he some infallible arbiter of truth.