Jarnhamar said:I wonder what atrocities Hillary would have to commit before her fans would question their loyalty. Maybe if the drone strike she suggested for Assange would inadvertently take out their families too that might sway them? We're ignoring the whole Uranium thing right?
tomahawk6 said:It turns out that Speaker Ryan had the audio of Trump leaked via his chief of staff.If Trump wins one of the first casualties may be Speaker Ryan who could be replaced by the Republican caucus,that is if they retain the majority.
milnews.ca said::nod: Which is also the system that helped Trump, going into the nomination in the lead, magnify his lead - that, and none of the other candidates being willing to say, "hey, I'll back any other decent runner for the good of the party, and will stop my own climb up the greasy pole."
Jarnhamar said:I heard Trump kills their family and erases all evidence of their existence including having local phone books burned where he secretly slides in a Koran here and there. It's true.
Perhaps. After all, he is a master baiter >Loachman said:There are various theories going around regarding the origin of the leak, including Mr Trump himself in order to bait Hillary.
cavalryman said:After all, he is a master baiter >
George Wallace said:Do you apply this same logic towards the Clinton's?
cupper said:Now I understand. You are confused as to who's who. That's Clinton, not Trump. Get your conspiracies straight. [
Bird_Gunner45 said:Yes. I dont view the world in black and white as most of the people here do. I've never suggested that the clinton's were perfect, or even good. I just think Trump is the least qualified, least intelligent, and least desirable presidential candidate in my lifetime. That Clinton is better than Trump is hardly a glowing recommendation. I would expect better from a grade 8 school president candidate.
Brad Sallows said:I think Hillary should win, because part of her solution for the humanitarian crisis in Syria is to enforce a no-fly zone in Syria. We don't see US and Russian [force]s shoot at each other often enough. It promises to be very entertaining.
Ahhhh -- thanks for that ....Technoviking said:Not quite. The GOP doesn't have the "Super Delegates", which they put up after the people nominated Jimmy Carter. After that, they wanted the appearance of choice to remain, but left it to the Super Delegates to anoint the chosen one.
:nod: & :nod:Technoviking said:The Donald probably won because the GOP base was sick and tired of the establishment republicans who did nothing (in their opinion) to counter the president once they had firm control of both houses. Also, it didn't help that from the get-go, there were...how many in the running? (Speaks directly to your point about none of the others backing someone else, e.g. Marco Rubio backing ie Ted Cruz.)
George Wallace said:So you are saying that those of us who think that Clinton is morally and ethically less credible than Trump, as well as being criminal, at the very least 'corrupt', are viewing the world in Black and White?
OK. If that is your argument, so be it. We are a bunch of close minded "everything is black and white" crowd. :-\
Sorry that we all don't agree with you, that Clinton is the better of two evils.
But this is what this whole discussion is about....so we have to cover all the bases.
Bird_Gunner45 said:This is basically 70+ pages of black and white character assassinations. I simply said that I dont view the world in black and white- both are bad, Trump is just worse. If you check the polls you'll find it's not an unusual stance. Whether you live in a black and white world is up to you. It certainly seems like there are many on here who are unwilling to even reason and think Clinton is evil and Trump is good.
No need to feel sorry... I dont care if you agree with me or not. Once Trump loses and becomes a university case study the world will be a better place.