• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
With this purchase
Our defence budget will look good on paper but tankers and vip aircraft are not enough
Need aircraft to refuel from the tankers
From a political-strategic point of view, that’s the best purchase that can be made, along with strat airlift. We’re increasing our defence spending, we can contribute to NATO in a capability NATO is desperately short of (and be seen as an added value within the Alliance) and that capability is non-kinetic. Win, win, win for the Government.
 
Makes you wonder what the necessary experience and prerequisites should be for Defense Minister. A script and teleprompt reader like Anand or the Architect of Medusa? Perhaps somewhere in the middle.
No worries. Katie Telford et al will tell them what to say.

I just looked up the "et al". Boy, that's a lot of people in the PMO:

 
I don't think any government has been 'good' to the military overall. Lots of talk and not much action..even under Harper there wasn't significant additions to the budget. For some reason all those gov types still think the average Canadian doesn't want a military. All the polls I have seen say otherwise...
 
Want to build the Canadian Forces numbers.

Simple as it gets

1) cut down the time it takes to get a recruit in the door of the armoury or the Reg Force front door. Treat recruiting like the war years, line them up, give them a physical, eye test, issue the uniforms, send them off to basic. Do the paper work as they progress thru the system, if there is a problem sort it out or dump the body at the bus station that night

2) Equipment, stop the rust collection, stop buying at the end of the life cycle. Example. Trucks, lots of trucks out there, need 1000 trucks of what ever kind. Look see what other countries in NATO are buying, if made in North America that is a bonus for us. Cheaper to have delivered. Buy 100 a year or 200 a year for 5 to 10 years, that way the life cycle of the trucks is longer. Newer trucks replace the older ones as required, but the last 200 trucks that come into use, are upgraded, have the bugs worked out. Weapons, start looking for the replacement soon as the new one is purchased and issued. FN took 40 years to replace, C7 were up graded and replaced often.
Aircraft and ships have to stop being a 2 generation purchase. 20 to 25 years and it should be gone. Once a in a lifetime purchases have to stop. The electronics and the materials are constantly changing so we should in turn be changing as the technology changes.

3) Current serving soldiers and officers, offer bonuses to re up and stay in the service. Make the family life easier by making the provinces accredited programs equal across the country, so the spouse does not have to seek employment out side of their field because the next posting does not accept the educational program as fitting to their program. A nurse, a teacher, a taxi driver license's should be the same across the country, like the RED Seal programs in trades.

4) Pay the bills of the deployments or issue advances to the troops on their claims to pay the costs, do not expect Pte Bloggin to pay his way across Europe because the Government did not think about it. A SgtMajor should be taking of the troops to make sure they are taken care of at home and overseas.

5) Stop the billing of an deployment as if the shoelaces that Pte Bloggin needed in Petawawa were different than the shoelaces he needs in Poland. His laces would of broken anyways and needed replacement anyways. Exercises and deployments have the same kind of costings. Have to feed the troops no matter what. Send the required food stuffs and the mess equipment to prepare and serve it. Make it run like a base over seas.

6) Build the numbers enough so deployments are not a yearly or every other year thing because the life cycle of the troops is going to be shorter as their home life now follows them over there too.

7) Give the Res Forces an actual job that be done and trained up in the Res training system, so they come prepared to uptrain to the level required for a deployment. I do not expect any one Res unit to have the man power available to fill an entire company or even a platoon but the Res Force in the Brigade should be able to provide a well trained Inf Platoon, or MSE Platoon or whatever is required that does not require 100% retraining and upskilled. They should be able to come and operate in the Company they are deploying with.

8) Make being a soldier again a career not a resume place holder.


DEO pilot is paused for at least two years, they can't even get current students from Phase 1 to Phase 2 without 'months' (read..years)....
 
Blair as MND, fug....

 
This is the first time in my memory that we've had at least a runner up in " the worst MND in Canadian history" before he even sat in the office chair.
Oh well we'll just have to measure our expectations accordingly.😉
 
Blair as MND, fug....

yeah I saw that, I cannot stand that man, he openly lies and is deceitful.
 
DEO pilot is paused for at least two years, they can't even get current students from Phase 1 to Phase 2 without 'months' (read..years)....
Being a former enlisted person I was only thinking of Basic training not the officer direct entry programs, with my magic wand I could only dream of fixing one problem s
 
I don't think any government has been 'good' to the military overall. Lots of talk and not much action..even under Harper there wasn't significant additions to the budget. For some reason all those gov types still think the average Canadian doesn't want a military. All the polls I have seen say otherwise...
The military reached its largest point since the cold war under Harper. The problem was that all the extra money went to Afghanistan and the rest of the Canadian Forces continued to rust. When they finally had to shut the money tap, the new stuff looked like it had just gone through a war and none of the other stuff was touched. Part of that was on the CF, we were supposed to increase the force to 73000 but we were unable to do it and when told to cut the tail not the tiger, every level of command pushed the cuts down until it hit the units who had no one else to push them down to. Part of that was on Harper. They should have addressed the issues with the whole CF instead of robbing Peter to pay Paul. Putting Julian Fantino in the Veterans spot also ensured a lot of bitter veterans who are usually your best recruiters. Meanwhile the Liberals are working to "improve the CAF" it's just they don't mean the same thing when they say that as we do. A military that completely embodies Justin Trudeau's worldview is infinitely more attractive that a well equipped, well trained, modern, first world military.
 
Be nice to see the leaked wish list. Thats about our Defence plans amount to. 12 submarines was probably overly ambitious
 
Be nice to see the leaked wish list. Thats about our Defence plans amount to. 12 submarines was probably overly ambitious
12 subs, replacing the Kingstons, more equipment, fast tracking a lot of projects, Dwan is filled with DNDs "wants" which are significant but definitely needed.
 

I'd hold off on firing up the outrage bus. The actual quote from the article:
"On AUKUS as we continue to develop it … the door is very much open for New Zealand and other partners to engage as they see appropriate going forward,” Blinken told reporters in New Zealand. “We’ve long worked together on the most important national security issues, and so as we further develop AUKUS, as I said, the door is open to engagement."

So, it's not really "AUKUS" if it's "AUKUS and friends".
 
This is the first time in my memory that we've had at least a runner up in " the worst MND in Canadian history" before he even sat in the office chair.
Oh well we'll just have to measure our expectations accordingly.😉
Be pretty hard to top Sam Hughes and Hellyer
 
Back
Top