I'll believe it when I see it.
Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending
- Thread starter Maxman1
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 5,268
- Points
- 1,040
Bitterness has whiny overexagerated a tone. There is a lot of that on these forums. Cynicism is just skepticism and is not necessarily negative.
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 13,787
- Points
- 1,140
I will take "Chynical shit" for 12 billion Alex!!! (Sean Connery)
In my case it is cynicism. I have listened to government promises all the way back to a "life means life" statement made and have followed the empty rhetoric from there so forgive me if I hope that what I hear is true but will only believe it when the first delivery occurs.
- Reaction score
- 1,150
- Points
- 1,160
NATO Meeting.
2% by 2032. No real plan on how we get there, but the "commitment" to do so is something, I suppose.
- Reaction score
- 4,123
- Points
- 1,260
So...Canada firmly committed in 2014, and have backslid since then. How mnay times since then has this government committed to increasing, only to later prevaricate.
NATO sees Canada as a country, not a Trudeau Liberal government. The Trudeau government (he is the only real decider) has never understood that - in fact they refuse to consider it, so vainglorious, arrogant, and tone-deaf are they.
Canada made the commitment in 2014 and the country is being held to account.
NATO sees Canada as a country, not a Trudeau Liberal government. The Trudeau government (he is the only real decider) has never understood that - in fact they refuse to consider it, so vainglorious, arrogant, and tone-deaf are they.
Canada made the commitment in 2014 and the country is being held to account.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 29,112
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 6,798
- Points
- 1,310
I commit to becoming bilingual by the time I reach Major.
Still not adequately resourced or motivated to do so. But the commitment is there...
GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,722
- Points
- 1,160
Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 7,803
- Points
- 1,040
I suppose they're going to do the goodest job they can.
- Reaction score
- 4,809
- Points
- 1,160
I'm not sure the highlighted bit is 100% accurate. I think then Prime Minister Harper said, in Wales, that 2% was an "aspirational goal."
quadrapiper
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 384
- Points
- 810
Given the stakes, I hope there's an executive order or similar drafted to shift whatever US equipment stocks can be spared to Ukraine should Trump win.
QV
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,834
- Points
- 1,010
My guess is Trump will take a more firm stance on the Ukr issue than the current incumbent.
QV
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,834
- Points
- 1,010
That theory doesn't match his public attempts to get Europe off of Russian energy supplies, European leaders laughed. How did that go?
- Reaction score
- 19,237
- Points
- 1,260
Trump thinks he’s smarter than Putin, and that he can handle him. I’m not sure that is true…
I see a major conflict erupting when Putin doesn’t listen to Trump, and Trump won’t back down.
The question is when will that happen, not if…
I see a major conflict erupting when Putin doesn’t listen to Trump, and Trump won’t back down.
The question is when will that happen, not if…
- Reaction score
- 5,271
- Points
- 1,060
)
100% pure hyperbolic speculation
100% pure hyperbolic speculation
QV
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,834
- Points
- 1,010
It will be a matter of a redline and if anyone blinks. If I were to guess today, soon after Trump assumes office there is a cease to hostilities with both sides holding firm. After negotiations (promises, offerings, blustering and threats of a bigger red button) Russian agrees to pulls back somewhat but not all the way. A UN patrolled zone of separation is established. Trudeau jumps at the chance to commit Canadian troops to a UN "peace keeping" mission, but Canada's participation is refused due to it's material support to war effort of one side.
Similar threads
- Article
